Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Matt Smith

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Darkranger
    Silver Seat
    • Jan 2018
    • 1172

    #1

    Matt Smith

    Has now been recalled by City.
  • Jeffqpr
    Silver Seat
    • Jun 2015
    • 1832

    #2
    And joined Charlton

    Comment

    • QPRDave
      The number 10
      • Mar 2009
      • 32061

      #3
      Brilliantly run club.
      Tbh serves us right, we told him and City he wasn't good enough for us.
      More own goals off the pitch than on it

      Comment

      • MYU
        Administrator
        • Mar 2009
        • 43466

        #4
        One of the worst players I've ever seen at this club.

        Comment

        • Stainrod
          Silver Seat
          • Jan 2018
          • 3162

          #5
          I first saw him v Swansea at home early in the season and wasn’t impressed . Seem him on a few other occasions since and thought he was very light weight and ineffective. Not a great decision to take him on loan in the first place , same with Brighton striker.

          Comment

          • BarryBarry
            Apprentice
            • May 2014
            • 117

            #6
            Genuinely don’t get why anyone would be remotely be bothered about loan players who’ve hardly played leaving. Worst case, it will give a youth player some game time

            Comment

            • Stainrod
              Silver Seat
              • Jan 2018
              • 3162

              #7
              Originally posted by BarryBarry
              Genuinely don’t get why anyone would be remotely be bothered about loan players who’ve hardly played leaving. Worst case, it will give a youth player some game time
              Because it gives some fans a reason to moan .

              Comment

              • MYU
                Administrator
                • Mar 2009
                • 43466

                #8
                We wasted money on some of his wages that's why.

                Comment

                • Darkranger
                  Silver Seat
                  • Jan 2018
                  • 1172

                  #9
                  Totally agree, no point in keeping loanies who aren't likely to play.

                  Comment

                  • knocker
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4009

                    #10
                    Nailed on for winner against us at the valley.

                    Comment

                    • HertsHoops
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 758

                      #11
                      Presumably that's what a loan is for - to see if they're any good

                      With a percentage of his wages paid by the parent club

                      Amos has blown hot and cold all season and Smith couldn't get in the side ahead of him

                      Comment

                      • Stainrod
                        Silver Seat
                        • Jan 2018
                        • 3162

                        #12
                        Originally posted by knocker
                        Nailed on for winner against us at the valley.
                        That’s the spirit

                        Comment

                        • QPRDave
                          The number 10
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 32061

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Stainrod
                          I first saw him v Swansea at home early in the season and wasn’t impressed . Seem him on a few other occasions since and thought he was very light weight and ineffective. Not a great decision to take him on loan in the first place , same with Brighton striker.
                          Yeah agree, shambles

                          Comment

                          • QPRDave
                            The number 10
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 32061

                            #14
                            Originally posted by BarryBarry
                            Genuinely don’t get why anyone would be remotely be bothered about loan players who’ve hardly played leaving. Worst case, it will give a youth player some game time
                            Which one?
                            Bearing in mind you said he has hardly played

                            Comment

                            • stanistheman
                              Platinum Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 11151

                              #15
                              Originally posted by BarryBarry
                              Genuinely don’t get why anyone would be remotely be bothered about loan players who’ve hardly played leaving. Worst case, it will give a youth player some game time
                              I'm not bothered about him as he hardly played, same goes for Mlakar if he goes, but I am concerned that Wells and Leistner are not being replaced.

                              Comment

                              Working...