Wells interview

[Rich]

https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/nahki-wells-the-first-interview/

[Stainrod]

Not our player , not interested.

[northampton rs]

Not our player , not interested.

I think he wanted to be , but with these Harsh punishments that we are under that wasn’t an option.
As I’ve said in other threads I can’t understand why our Lawyers are not banging on some doors and getting something done retrospectively.

[CroydonCaptainJack]

I think he wanted to be , but with these Harsh punishments that we are under that wasn’t an option.
As I’ve said in other threads I can’t understand why our Lawyers are not banging on some doors and getting something done retrospectively.

Because I think they feel we got a result.

[LoftusRoadLad]

[northampton rs]

Because I think they feel we got a result.

Great result !
If that’s the case I wouldn’t want them Defending me.

[QPRDave]

I think he wanted to be , but with these Harsh punishments that we are under that wasn’t an option.
As I’ve said in other threads I can’t understand why our Lawyers are not banging on some doors and getting something done retrospectively.

Me neither, we have been singled out for special punishment.
If a country abolished the death penalty, would they continue to execute the prisoners on death row?
Our punishment should've been under the new rules, simple as that.

[QPRDave]

Great result !
If that’s the case I wouldn’t want them Defending me.

Lol

[CroydonCaptainJack]

Great result !
If that’s the case I wouldn’t want them Defending me.

Read up on it maybe.

[stanistheman]

Me neither, we have been singled out for special punishment.
If a country abolished the death penalty, would they continue to execute the prisoners on death row?
Our punishment should've been under the new rules, simple as that.

I agree. the club could have appealed on the basis you described.

Some of us on here thought along those lines at the time that the club woud be dealt with under the new rules even though the 'crime' was under the old ones. But I agree that the club's lawyers thought it was a result so didn't appeal.

[northampton rs]

Read up on it maybe.

I’ll freely admit I’ve not read all available, but it’s Clearly “Payback” for AF saga .

[Undecided]

Lawyers? Turning away business?

Perhaps we just can't afford their fees?

[klonk]

I’ll freely admit I’ve not read all available, but it’s Clearly “Payback” for AF saga .

You honestly think this is all about Faurlin?

no link to us continuing to splash the cash despite knowing that we were breaking the rules., then...