Not Amits fault, however the board either need to back mclaren or sack him, if 3 games is justified to sack him probably not however Hoos either rightly or wrongly quoted loan window is our business window get on with it. As fans we have no moral right to demand anything just live in hope things improve however with this substandard squad league 1 is harsh reality and probability of the board think otherwise I suggest they react quick if league one is acceptable carry on as normal.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Amit tweet
Collapse
X
-
Not Amit's fault at all. Every bit of blame should fall at everyones mate Tony Fernandes's feet as the man has managed to destroy every bit of hope and good feeling that was put together in 2010 to 2011. How any Rangers supporter can defend him is beyond meComment
-
Amit has right royaly been dropped into the shite by that fat useless karnt fernandes. Going to take a miracle to sort it out.Comment
-
If he’s got anything about him he will go and bring someone like Mick McCarthy. Knows the league and can keep a team in the division on a shoe string budgetComment
-
Not a bad shout, not gonna be some people's cup of tea, but then losing first 3 games scoring once and letting in 10 ain't my cup of teaComment
-
I don't think this is true. Might be something that needs a thread in itself but fundamentally, we'd have needed to spend to stay in the Prem anyway. Spending wasn't the issue, who we spent on was the issue. Unfortunately, we didn't stay up when we were in the prem but we wouldn't have been able to spend anyway because revenue is poor. Most of the big spenders at this level are recent prem relegation fodder who want to beat the system by getting up in the first season. We don't have a big stadium and that was the priority for Fernandes. Unfortunately, we couldn't get Old Oak because of CG and now we're stuck with a low revenue stadium and clubs seem to think we will sell for pennies. Regardless of the overspending in the past, we all know that if the owners could spend more, they would have. Now with FFP, they can't so the only way is infrastructure spending and that just hasn't been able to work when we're a small team in London looking to start expanding so late on."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
tell that to bourmouth and huddlesfield.
I don't think this is true. Might be something that needs a thread in itself but fundamentally, we'd have needed to spend to stay in the Prem anyway. Spending wasn't the issue, who we spent on was the issue. Unfortunately, we didn't stay up when we were in the prem but we wouldn't have been able to spend anyway because revenue is poor. Most of the big spenders at this level are recent prem relegation fodder who want to beat the system by getting up in the first season. We don't have a big stadium and that was the priority for Fernandes. Unfortunately, we couldn't get Old Oak because of CG and now we're stuck with a low revenue stadium and clubs seem to think we will sell for pennies. Regardless of the overspending in the past, we all know that if the owners could spend more, they would have. Now with FFP, they can't so the only way is infrastructure spending and that just hasn't been able to work when we're a small team in London looking to start expanding so late on.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐Comment
-
Comment