Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hart, done deal?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eghamR
    Bronze Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 713

    #31
    Originally posted by Nodge70
    Terrible appointment.

    Still - cheap as chips and knows from Portsmouth when and where to keep his mouth shut and let the Directors get on with the buying and selling.

    Just don't learn do we?
    Agree

    Comment

    • Robsondinho
      Platinum Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 12697

      #32
      Harford is a legend, took luton to the confrence
      @chrisrobson9

      Comment

      • scuberry
        Silver Seat
        • Jun 2009
        • 1882

        #33
        If this is true,then where's the improvement on Jim and John ?? i can really see these appointments getting bums on seats for the rest of the season,not....! mate of mine who is a Looton supporter reckons harford was absolute rubbish and was glad to see the back of him,but here we go again,appointing people that nobody else wants,as others have said "Do we NEVER learn" ?????

        Comment

        • sirpiechucker
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 5079

          #34
          Originally posted by qblockpete
          With all due respect and a great job they did, Gallen and Bircham don't want it.
          Hart and Harford would give the team much needed grit. Nobody would dare headbutt either of those two or try playing billy big balls with them.

          Comment

          • WeAreQPR12
            C Club
            • Mar 2009
            • 23544

            #35
            I think after Micks last spell at the club he deserves alot more respect then he's getting!!!!
            I played sunday league football today.

            Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

            I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

            We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

            Comment

            • qblockpete
              C Club
              • Mar 2009
              • 22186

              #36
              With all due respect, Harford did start with minus 30 for Luton
              ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
              THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

              Comment

              • WeAreQPR12
                C Club
                • Mar 2009
                • 23544

                #37
                excactly Pete. Can we not act like Harford is clueless.
                The guy was brilliant last time under very difficult circumstances
                I played sunday league football today.

                Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

                I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

                We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

                Comment

                • Bluehoop
                  Gold Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 9258

                  #38
                  Originally posted by New Cross R
                  It's an annoying appointment, because we all know he'll be sacked in March once our season is well and truly over. Why can't we just appoint someone decent and stick with them? There's NO WAY the players will want to play for Hart. Would prefer Gallen and Bircham to be honest, with Ainsworth as a coach.
                  They are thought to be being offered six month contracts - presumably so we don't need to go through the grief and compensation racket if and when they fail.
                  #standuptocancer
                  #inyourfacecancer

                  Comment

                  • sirpiechucker
                    Gold Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 5079

                    #39
                    Originally posted by qblockpete
                    With all due respect, Harford did start with minus 30 for Luton
                    With those 30 points they would have actually finished above Notts County and Bournemouth last season who are both having good seasons this year.

                    I don't think it would be the worst appointment.

                    Comment

                    • Receed R

                      #40
                      Originally posted by qblockpete
                      With all due respect and a great job they did, Gallen and Bircham don't want it.
                      do u blame them pete with that big orange tango man breathing down their throat

                      thats briatore by the way

                      Comment

                      • Goddard
                        Silver Seat
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 4529

                        #41
                        One sacked by Rushden and Diamonds, Barnsley and Portmouth, one sacked by Luton and Rotherham.


                        People aren't even bothering to moan in great numbers anymore. Can you imagine if these two had been placed in charge at the begining of "The 5 Year Project"?!

                        Now?? We've had all the high hopes kicked out of us, and just accept this cr*p with a shrug of the shoulders.
                        We've gone past the stage of scraping the barrel - we're digging around under it now.


                        Yeah great, they'll do, carry on, whatever, etc...
                        Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


                        Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

                        Comment

                        • scuberry
                          Silver Seat
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 1882

                          #42
                          Pete,he didn't start with minus 30 in the conference and he was sacked,because they were going backwards,maybe his problem is that he ain't a manager,but a No 2 guess we will see,but this isn't the appointment AGAIN that the supporters wanted to see,they want some ambition shown,and i don't think these appointments will get the supporters buzzing,which is what we need after recent events !!

                          Comment

                          • sirpiechucker
                            Gold Seat
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 5079

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Goddard
                            One sacked by Rushden and Diamonds, Barnsley and Portmouth, one sacked by Luton and Rotherham.


                            People aren't even bothering to moan in great numbers anymore. Can you imagine if these two had been placed in charge at the begining of "The 5 Year Project"?!

                            Now?? We've had all the high hopes kicked out of us, and just accept this cr*p with a shrug of the shoulders.
                            We've gone past the stage of scraping the barrel - we're digging around under it now.


                            Yeah great, they'll do, carry on, whatever, etc...
                            Look I do agree with what you are saying but the problem is the board have brought this on themselves. If they had had patience with Dowie then we would never have sacked Sousa and we would look at whole lot more respectable. Instead Dowie, Sousa and now Magilton have gone and we are left with very little choice.

                            Strange analogy but its like we started off as an omnivore, then became a carnivore, then became a vegetarian, followed by becoming a vegan and now we are a fruitarian.

                            Comment

                            • Goddard
                              Silver Seat
                              • Dec 2009
                              • 4529

                              #44
                              Originally posted by sirpiechucker
                              Look I do agree with what you are saying but the problem is the board have brought this on themselves.
                              Of course they have.

                              But the effect of all that is apathy and submission.

                              That's even worse than moaning, and is more damaging because people just slowly drift away shrugging their shoulders.
                              Others might not like that, but people just get fed up with the whole pantomime in the end.


                              "Maybe one day they'll get lucky, but for now... just let them get on with it, what can we do about it?" That sort of thing.
                              Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


                              Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

                              Comment

                              • Pal
                                Bronze Seat
                                • May 2009
                                • 506

                                #45
                                I think the point that they are both basically good number 2s is significant, as they will be used to taking orders from above.
                                Let's face it all the jobs that would be done by a normal English manager are being done by others at Rangers, bar the coaching, which would be the number 2s job.

                                Comment

                                Working...