Akos Buzsaky

[Morris]

May be something to do with him playing left wing when he should be behind Simpson.

Maybe.

See my above post.

[paulmason]

100% agree, its worth a shot, ok so say it doesnt work, we just switch adel or routledge for buzz...

Routledge Right Wing.
Tarabbt Left Wing.
Buzz Behind Striker.

Why switch tarabbt and routledge from there best positions ?

[Morris]

Routledge Right Wing.
Tarabbt Left Wing.
Buzz Behind Striker.

Thats what id go with.

[Robbo]

He is being played too deep and had to track back too much for Williams, wheraes, Borrowdale would simply pass the ball to him

Seems like you've found your first scapegoat for the season. After ONE game, when they were all sh*t.
You might not agree with the critisism of "Bozza"... but rightly or wrongly, at least that opinion was based on a fair few games, not just his debut!

Ok, Apart from it being Tommy Williams' fault(!), any other reason you can think of for Buzsaky's recent loss of form?
Maybe Sousa, Ephraim, Thierry Henry, Katie Price?



Laughable.

[sirpiechucker]

He is being played too deep and had to track back too much for Williams, wheraes, Borrowdale would simply pass the ball to him

On the same day that you attack members of your message board for the booing of Mahon and saying how they were were wrong to doubt him you attack a player after just one match??? Can we all remember this if and when Williams starts playing well.

Say you are right and that Williams was 100% to blame for Buzsaky's poor performance against Doncaster what excuse does Buzsaky have for playing below par in the other matches that Williams didn't feature in. After all the two have only ever played 90 minutes together and it might take just a little more to get an understanding of each others games.

[BuzsakyIsGod]

Needs to up his level of performance or he could find himself on the bench.

Hes not the only one, but he hasnt performed in the last 4-5 games now, we cant afford to start carrying players through games.

I know some feel he is untouchable because he wears the no.10 shirt but if hes not performing Jim will drop him, he done it before after the Accrington game.

He needs to be in the middle that is why. He is effective there not on the wing!

[rangersroar]

Buz is not a winger, he has not got the pace. He needs players to support him when he receives the ball. Lately our mid-field have gone missing, with the exception of Faurlin.

[Robbo]

I don't think he's too lightweight to play in the middle... he works hard, and is strong enough.
As long as you have a more holding midfielder alongside him, but you could say that about all creative midfielders.
Faurlin can play the holding role more than ok.

[BennyBoyRs]

Peter, Peter, Peter...that's class mate

[Youvebeenrangered]

Routledge Right Wing.
Tarabbt Left Wing.
Buzz Behind Striker.

Why switch tarabbt and routledge from there best positions ?

I agree routledge right taarabt left and buz behind the striker, i was just saying if buz got bogged down and wasnt having any luck we could try tarrabt or routledge there....

[pkloft]

He is being played too deep and had to track back too much for Williams, wheraes, Borrowdale would simply pass the ball to him

[qblockpete]

love the graphics

Buzsacky has hardly been played behind the front man and play his best games out wide for us.

Okay, it was tongue in cheek about Borrowdale, but Buzz is better being given the ball, not tracking back to get it and thats why your idea of him playing centre midfield is flawed.

We should go back to basics, to what got us the goals a few weeks back. All teams go through blips and some of you are just a little too hasty expecting to win every game

You play Routledge up front with Simpson and switch Tarrabt and Buzz on the wings, its not rocket science. You can also switch Routledge and Tarrbt from time to time.

We simply were too hasty because Routledge missed a couple of sitters versus Palace, it was going well to that point, no reason to change it.

[W12_Ranger]

I didnt actually say he had played there before, i said i think he would do well there...

I think he would do well there, routledge has allways been good attacking defenders so have him on the wing where he is used to running at LB's....

Buzsaky has a excellent shot on him, i think he would create and score.

I totally understand what are saying but to play out wide doesn't mean you have to play as an orthodox winger. Buz hit 10 goals from playing right side of midfield under LDC.....was David Beckham a convential winger despite playing RM all his career.

He needs to be in the middle that is why. He is effective there not on the wing!

How many games have you seen Buz play in the centre for us?

Name them!

Buz is not a winger, he has not got the pace. He needs players to support him when he receives the ball. Lately our mid-field have gone missing, with the exceptoin of Faurlin.

Rubbish you don't have to play as winger to play RM or LM also Buz has turn of pace and he doesn't require constant support. Players of Buzsakys ability create space for themselves and those around them, his abilty to create something out of nothing totally contradicts your point.

Buzsaky at times has been very effective for us out wide.

I don't think he's too lightweight to play in the middle... he works hard, and is strong enough.
As long as you have a more holding midfielder alongside him, but you could say that about all creative midfielders.
Faurlin can play the holding role more than ok.

I agree and when you analyse like this yes it does make sense that it could work. Faurlin can do the holding role no question asked IMO and he is a better player than Watson. Buzsaky is also far more combative than what people give him credit for, is strong and also wins his fair share of headers.

To simply sit him behind the front 2 or loan striker would make him too much of a luxury epsecially in this division. The only way Buzsaky could trully control a game is if he is playing as a proper centre midfielder box to box but in a slightly more advanced role to his CM partner. We have never seen him play in this position though we know he has the ability but I just can't help thinking there is a reason why he doesn't.....not one manager for us has played him there!

[pkloft]

love the graphics

Buzsacky has hardly been played behind the front man and play his best games out wide for us.

Okay, it was tongue in cheek about Borrowdale, but Buzz is better being given the ball, not tracking back to get it and thats why your idea of him playing centre midfield is flawed.

We should go back to basics, to what got us the goals a few weeks back. All teams go through blips and some of you are just a little too hasty expecting to win every game

You play Routledge up front with Simpson and switch Tarrabt and Buzz on the wings, its not rocket science. You can also switch Routledge and Tarrbt from time to time.

We simply were too hasty because Routledge missed a couple of sitters versus Palace, it was going well to that point, no reason to change it.

in all seriousness i was trying to find a place for them all WR AB AF & AT but because the squad is so unbalanced only 1 right back that's why legs has got to fill in there, up to the other day 1 left back (well some say he is)

absolute bundles of midfielders, then there's the "forward" Simpson, you trying to tell me our squad isn't unbalanced?

if you read sirpie's statistics on shots on target & goals scored ratio you might change your mind (that's if your allowed too) as he deals in FACTS midfielders playing up top are not as good as natural forwards....FACT

[Stanley]

The fact is to date Buzsaky has played his best football for the club as a RM under Di Canio. If we want to see the best of him again that is where he needs to be played. Failing that, CM. Being right-footed, Magilton isnt getting the best from him playing him on the left.