Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Lua Lua

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RobertoQPR
    Bronze Seat
    • Jan 2010
    • 369

    #1

    Lua Lua

    I know this has been said before but why on earth was he brought back? To top it all off hes starting for our under 23's! What a waste of a loan! Must be the only club to loan players to play for the youth team lol
  • LoftusRoadLad
    W12 Seat
    • Jan 2011
    • 19591

    #2
    Lack of fitness ?

    Comment

    • stanistheman
      Platinum Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 11151

      #3
      Originally posted by RobertoQPR
      I know this has been said before but why on earth was he brought back? To top it all off hes starting for our under 23's! What a waste of a loan! Must be the only club to loan players to play for the youth team lol
      Tbh, I didn't think he was good enough last season to warrant being signed again for this. a waste of a loan, because he can't play wing back. which was the system that Holloway was intending to use.

      Comment

      • Jimmy Floyd Rabbit
        Gold Seat
        • Sep 2012
        • 8957

        #4
        A daft decision.

        Comment

        • West Acton
          CCG
          • Dec 2009
          • 21475

          #5
          Ask the manager. Hardly played last season and when he did ineffective hardly played this season and when he does ineffective

          Expect him here next season

          Comment

          • corbray
            Silver Seat
            • Feb 2016
            • 3030

            #6
            i don't get why we brought him in when we already had bidwell, robinson, shodipo and eventually bright already.
            don't get me wrong, hes good on his day but too injury prone and inconsistent

            Comment

            • Rangers77
              Platinum Seat
              • Aug 2012
              • 11808

              #7
              PantsPants.....

              Comment

              • Kevin Mcleod
                Referee
                • Aug 2013
                • 17322

                #8
                LuaserLuaser

                Comment

                • Brian Wilson
                  Silver Seat
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 4400

                  #9
                  Has looked decent when played IMO...maybe a discipline issue.

                  Comment

                  • West Acton
                    CCG
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 21475

                    #10
                    You think wilo??? He puts defenders on back foot because of his pace but I can’t think of many telling balls he’s put in after beating his man. Squad player from bench is his role and think he’s even fallen down that pecking order

                    Comment

                    • Brian Wilson
                      Silver Seat
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 4400

                      #11
                      Originally posted by West Acton
                      You think wilo??? He puts defenders on back foot because of his pace but I can’t think of many telling balls he’s put in after beating his man. Squad player from bench is his role and think he’s even fallen down that pecking order
                      Yeah, was thinking more off the bench running at tired defenders. He has the ability and supposedly could have just stayed at Brighton and just picked up a wage.

                      Comment

                      • Tarbie
                        Gold Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 8542

                        #12
                        Originally posted by stanistheman
                        Tbh, I didn't think he was good enough last season to warrant being signed again for this. a waste of a loan, because he can't play wing back. which was the system that Holloway was intending to use.
                        This.

                        Has looked bang average whenever he's played, and he doesn't even fit the system Ollie has used 90% of the time. Can only assume that he isn't costing us much, cos re-signing him makes zero sense to me.

                        Comment

                        • Joe90
                          Silver Seat
                          • Feb 2014
                          • 1080

                          #13
                          I thought he looked good the first few times he played for us, especially at this level! He was fast and strong, ran at players and was popping off shots. However, he did very quickly go down hill. An impact sub possibly? As I said, at our level who can we attract? I thought a player like van La Parra would have been what perfect.

                          Comment

                          • Qprtanpa1
                            Silver Seat
                            • Mar 2014
                            • 1793

                            #14
                            Lua Lua is not the same player. A bummer, but it’s clear. Time to promote “hat trick Shodipo” and when his loan is up Eze.

                            Comment

                            • Rebel R's
                              King of Pessimism
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 12266

                              #15
                              Mackie is the answer to our problems ,he wears his heart on his sleeve (pity he can't play for s h i t)

                              Comment

                              Working...