Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

The XI v Huddersfield? Time for Speed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shepherds Mush
    Platinum Seat
    • Nov 2012
    • 10325

    #16
    If Hall is match fit he simply has to start IMO.

    Comment

    • rodman
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 1341

      #17
      Originally posted by Hubble
      On paper I like that a lot, but like Kev says, not sure Ravel is match fit enough to start. Also feel Goss not fully up to speed yet. It worked having Hall as a DM and I feel we have to respect Hudds, we can't be too open at the back.
      if we can't be too open at the back then we need to drop Furlong and replace with Perch.

      Comment

      • Kevin Mcleod
        Referee
        • Aug 2013
        • 17322

        #18
        Originally posted by rodman
        if we can't be too open at the back then we need to drop Furlong and replace with Perch.
        Think thats a dead cert after Ollies uber glowing comments on Perch today.

        Comment

        • LoftusRoadLad
          W12 Seat
          • Jan 2011
          • 19596

          #19
          Originally posted by rodman
          if we can't be too open at the back then we need to drop Furlong and replace with Perch.
          My thoughts too. As much as I like our boy we cannot let teams believe that our weak area is on the left.

          Comment

          • James1979
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 4857

            #20
            I'm not sure that defender playing midfield / defence has gone too well at home. Midifielders in midfield, defence in defence and attacker up front. Keep it simple at home.

            Comment

            • Tarbie
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 8542

              #21
              Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
              Is Ravel fully match fit and raring to go then?
              Doubt he's match fit to be honest. Rumours were he was a long way from fit when he pitched up!

              Comment

              • The General
                Silver Seat
                • Apr 2011
                • 1649

                #22
                Love that team Loftus exactly what i would play on Saturday.

                Comment

                • hal9thou
                  Silver Seat
                  • May 2012
                  • 4258

                  #23
                  Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad
                  ----------------------Smithies--------------------

                  Perch-----------Ned------------Hall-------Bidwell

                  ------------Goss-----------------Manning---------

                  ------------------------Ravel------------------------

                  Pawel---------------Washington-----------Mackie

                  Watcha all think ? Or will he stick to the Toons team ?
                  That looks a common sense outfit, much better balance than three at the back given our resources. I'd like to see the lad Eze on the bench. If fit.

                  Comment

                  • Qprtanpa1
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 1793

                    #24
                    Good comments all. Great to have options. Agree Ravel should be a sub atm, but one that's used. Love the way Mackie plays, but would definitely platoon him with Lualua when we have two match weeks; too much for one of our older players. Agree that Perch the more solid defender than Furlong, but need to develop latter as a first team player; coin flip here. What's most interesting on this thread is that Luongo is not on anyone's starting lineup sheet.

                    Comment

                    Working...