Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JFH named
Collapse
X
-
I have just listened to the video again and I can't see where it says that he was going to be paid 55,000 for giving a speech.
-
Whatever the outcome from it all, JFH contract is up soon and what we have seen so far from the squad with JFH in charge shouldnt continue by extending his contract for another year anyway.Originally posted by stanistheman View PostAs you say most of the general public dont know who JFH is and even less in the Far East, which is why I asked what makes him worth £55K for a speaking event.
It might be difficult if not impossible to prove he was about to do something wrong, but it does question his character. Do QPR really want him to stay on?
We couldn't do any worse by bringing in someone else now!!!
Leave a comment:
-
As you say most of the general public dont know who JFH is and even less in the Far East, which is why I asked what makes him worth £55K for a speaking event.Originally posted by HoopDoggyDogg View PostCan't see how the Telegraph would bother with all this over JFH if not true.
Why would they go with it all, and risk being sued for millions over a story they have edited to expose JFH.
Most of the General Public probably have no idea who he is anyway.
Just can't see how the Telegraph would run with this, just over Jimmy.
It might be difficult if not impossible to prove he was about to do something wrong, but it does question his character. Do QPR really want him to stay on?Last edited by stanistheman; 30-09-2016, 12:45 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Can't see how the Telegraph would bother with all this over JFH if not true.
Why would they go with it all, and risk being sued for millions over a story they have edited to expose JFH.
Most of the General Public probably have no idea who he is anyway.
Just can't see how the Telegraph would run with this, just over Jimmy.
Leave a comment:
-
Take a bow.Originally posted by qprjeff1882 View PostI thought that about Harry too. He used his excuses to cloud that he couldn't give a s**t about the club. At least you could see Warnock and Ollie had pride in what they were doing. And winning was everything to them. They both were visibly in love with the club and the atmosphere the fans showed the team when we played. The crowd played a massive part in us getting promoted under both of them. The crowd lifted the players immensely because those teams under those managers gave everything for the cause. If you have a manager who lives and breathes passion it lifts everyone around too, everyone buys into it. With JFH we don't have anything like Warnock or Ollie in fact it seems to be quite the opposite. Dull negative person giving us a dull and negative playing style and tactics. Crazy team formations when he has had the players to play them in their correct positions, dropping players next game when they have had a great game saying "he's young i don't want to burn him out". It's an hour and a half every three/four/seven days. When we were young we used to play more than that every night. Turning fans away by the thousands and causing more and more unrest as each game goes by. This alone is alienating fans and causing massive unrest with unwillingness to change things up to try and improve things is more than enough to get rid even before this latest episode. We need a manager that can set the team up with passing flair and an attacking mindset. Give the fans something to cheer and be proud of and you will get it back on matchday by having a full LOUD crowd who will be the 12th man and help make QPR and Loftus rd a force to be reckoned with. Sorry rant over.
Leave a comment:
-
The only stabilty we get from JFH is dire boredom during games and very few wins.Originally posted by Jimmy Floyd Rabbit View PostExactly. Forget his greed. If we're talking football decision only he has to go.
The one and only reason he should maybe be retained is stability. Problem with that is he's to stubborn and doesn't seem to learn from his mistakes, so for me I'd get shot. He has had time and money and we are in decline, not improving. If he got another year, I'd almost guarantee we'd have another year of exactly the same thing.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah see what you mean, but they definitely have not handed over anything. Refused us and Southampton, all both clubs have to act upon is whats in the papers and their online site.Originally posted by Stanley View PostWho knows Kevin. It's all speculation, but perhaps it's because they have further stuff on JFH up their sleeves, or maybe even other QPR related evidence. OTOH for all we know the transcripts and videos have already been handed over.
Hence impossible to sack anyone as its really not totally conclusive and a legal minefield.
Leave a comment:
-
Can I just ask why oh why would JFH be worth 55k to give a speech. Afterall wtf has he ever achieved as a manager or come to that a player, to suggest he is worth anywhere near that amount?
Of course, this wasn't a fee for a speech, but rather something a lot more underhand.
Leave a comment:
-
Perhaps it's because they have further stuff on JFH up their sleeves, or maybe even other QPR related evidence.Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostYes totally understand the sensationalism.
But each person you expose, hand over the full details to their employers as you go along.
Whats not doing that, doing to add to their cause?
Or maybe it's because if QPR's investigation finds no evidence of wrong-doing it then portrays DT in a poor light.
The bottom line is there's no real reason why it's in their interests to play ball with QPR.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes totally understand the sensationalism.Originally posted by Stanley View PostBecause they have further dirt they wish to dish in the next installment of their serial.
The police only have that right if someone lodges a formal complaint. The only other scenario would be in a court of law, if JFH sues the Telegraph for example.
But each person you expose, hand over the full details to their employers as you go along.
Whats not doing that, doing to add to their cause?
Leave a comment:
-
Because they have further dirt they wish to dish in the next installment of their serial.Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostWhy not hand over everything, really don't make sense.
The police only have that right if someone lodges a formal complaint to them. The only other scenario would be in court, if JFH sues the Telegraph for example.Originally posted by qprjeff1882 View PostIf that ends up being the case then the police have a right to have them done for withholding evidence, surely.
Leave a comment:
-
They have done loads mate. Ten months investigation.Originally posted by HoopDoggyDogg View PostJust a thought..
Out of all the managers that The Telegraph could have set up in this.
Why choose JFH?
There must have been something there from the start that they felt was worth setting it all up.
Eight prem managers been done and jfh, Barnsley bloke and Leeds owner.
The rest must of turned them down.
Leave a comment:
-
Because DT have far more conclusive evidence and are waiting to see how the clubs react.......can of worms you said it JFROriginally posted by Jimmy Floyd Rabbit View PostOpen a can of worms then step back. Lots of publicity, paper sales but retain the power by not handing over the tapes.
Leave a comment:
-
Just a thought..
Out of all the managers that The Telegraph could have set up in this.
Why choose JFH?
There must have been something there from the start that they felt was worth setting it all up.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: