Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JFH named

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kevin Mcleod
    replied
    IMG_20160929_182809.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • nasser95
    replied
    Originally posted by Hubble View Post
    Jimmy is clearly a stubborn and very determined man - his youth growing up in the tough Zaandam district where he was the youngest of six kids from a poor immigrant family who became a member of a street gang, spending three months in youth detention for stealing, says much about what moulded him, and then of course his determination to rise from that difficult start to become a top striker, shows that he is not going to give up his role lightly.

    I think in assuming his team selections and things like not playing Sandro are down to a lack of managerial nous is to underestimate him. He knows what he wants and he wants it his way. So although I find this kind of honey-trap journalism reprehensible (tempting someone to do what they might otherwise not do to get them to incriminate themselves in order to sell newspapers), and Jimmy has clearly put himself in a difficult situation, I think he will be determined to tough it out. Ultimately for him it's a test of character and if he comes through it, he will be stronger and more determined than ever to stamp his managerial authority. This is probably the biggest test he's had to face in his adult life, and the game against Fulham, if he is still manager, with half the fans against him, or at least mocking him, will be some trial. I reckon he might just come through it unscathed. Guess we'll soon see.
    See, now this is post of the day material.

    Fantastic stuff here. It's very unbiased and neutral as it should be.

    Leave a comment:


  • dogsrrs
    replied
    Originally posted by nasser95 View Post
    We also wanna go about it the right way. If he's convincing the players he's done nothing wrong and the club finds that he has, we don't end up with a morale problem. If we just sack him without conducting a full investigation, questions come up with the legitimacy of the sacking. It's all standard protocol for someone in his position and it'll get sorted, looking at the statement, the situation, etc, he'll probably be gone sooner rather than later. Certainly it's not as bad as some of the other ones, but he doesn't help himself at all with the tax thing, the make me happy and the getting warmer.
    The dross disgruntled fans gates starting to fall is enough in itself without the dirt , I can't see the the players being to concerned they can't be enjoying playing this crap

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by nasser95 View Post
    I assume they're doing all their research to see if they have legal ground to terminate his contract without fee.
    I hope so, but even then, theycan get rid becuase results & performances are not what was expected. Afterall, Ramsey eas sacked because they expected a promotion push, so why should they now accept bog standard mediocrity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevin Mcleod
    replied
    Originally posted by stanistheman View Post
    I have no issues with competent managers & coaches, just the likes of Redkrapp (Should have retired after the P/O final), Ramsey (Never qualified to even get the job on a temporary role never mind a 3 year deal) and JFH ( the football he has served up is diabolical to watch & even worse ,unsuccessful).
    Hughes and Warnock as well. Ive never seen a single manager even remotley liked by the gang since the day i joined here.

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View Post
    Not having a pop here, but i actually cant wait to see whos next and who you lot are going to hate and hound out as soon as he joins.
    I have no issues with competent managers & coaches, just the likes of Redkrapp (Should have retired after the P/O final), Ramsey (Never qualified to even get the job on a temporary role never mind a 3 year deal) and JFH ( the football he has served up is diabolical to watch & even worse ,unsuccessful).

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevin Mcleod
    replied
    Originally posted by dogsrrs View Post
    A fee can't be a lot due to the length of his contract , and he'll still get a pay off imo
    Its more than that though mate, he could sue us and the Telegraph.
    Got to be so careful.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hubble
    replied
    Jimmy is clearly a stubborn and very determined man - his youth growing up in the tough Zaandam district where he was the youngest of six kids from a poor immigrant family who became a member of a street gang, spending three months in youth detention for stealing, says much about what moulded him, and then of course his determination to rise from that difficult start to become a top striker, shows that he is not going to give up his role lightly.

    I think in assuming his team selections and things like not playing Sandro are down to a lack of managerial nous is to underestimate him. He knows what he wants and he wants it his way. So although I find this kind of honey-trap journalism reprehensible (tempting someone to do what they might otherwise not do to get them to incriminate themselves in order to sell newspapers), and Jimmy has clearly put himself in a difficult situation, I think he will be determined to tough it out. Ultimately for him it's a test of character and if he comes through it, he will be stronger and more determined than ever to stamp his managerial authority. This is probably the biggest test he's had to face in his adult life, and the game against Fulham, if he is still manager, with half the fans against him, or at least mocking him, will be some trial. I reckon he might just come through it unscathed. Guess we'll soon see.

    Leave a comment:


  • nasser95
    replied
    Originally posted by dogsrrs View Post
    A fee can't be a lot due to the length of his contract , and he'll still get a pay off imo
    We also wanna go about it the right way. If he's convincing the players he's done nothing wrong and the club finds that he has, we don't end up with a morale problem. If we just sack him without conducting a full investigation, questions come up with the legitimacy of the sacking. It's all standard protocol for someone in his position and it'll get sorted, looking at the statement, the situation, etc, he'll probably be gone sooner rather than later. Certainly it's not as bad as some of the other ones, but he doesn't help himself at all with the tax thing, the make me happy and the getting warmer.

    Leave a comment:


  • dogsrrs
    replied
    A fee can't be a lot due to the length of his contract , and he'll still get a pay off imo

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by Rangers77 View Post
    Jimmy would turn up. I'd invite him to a meeting in a Pret a Manager, offer him 30p, and we'd settle at 55p. Sorted.
    😄

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by Rangers77 View Post
    Jimmy would turn up. I'd invite him to a meeting in a Pret a Manager, offer him 30p, and we'd settle at 55p. Sorted.
    ��

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by Rangers77 View Post
    That'd be me
    Me too.
    I only favoured him above Ramsey.

    Leave a comment:


  • nasser95
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View Post
    Not having a pop here, but i actually cant wait to see whos next and who you lot are going to hate and hound out as soon as he joins.
    Start up a pool as soon as the new guy comes in for number of weeks before criticism becomes common.

    Leave a comment:


  • hal9thou
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View Post
    who you lot are going to hate and hound out
    they do it to themselves Kev. They don't need us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X