Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Warnock...oh, man, you're wasted at Rotherham....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Southport
    Bronze Seat
    • Jul 2014
    • 473

    #16
    Originally posted by Shania
    Have Rotherham won with him in charge? Did they play, yesterday?
    Rotherham drew 0-0 yesterday, but had two men sent off. He does get commitment from his players!

    Comment

    • Shania
      C Club
      • Apr 2010
      • 23699

      #17
      Ok^^ I agree with the commitment part, no doubt about that!
      QPR
      Best team in the world
      Sort of

      Comment

      • 72bus
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2011
        • 9533

        #18
        if he keeps rotherham up it will be a great feat

        Comment

        • Geng
          Silver Seat
          • Jul 2009
          • 1449

          #19
          A quick reminder of how we got on last time Warnock managed us vs Fulham

          We revisit Craven Cottage's ultimate demolition job in this week's Flashback, as Martin Jol's men hit West London rivals QPR for six in 2010. For…

          Comment

          • Hubble
            Postmodernist
            • Jan 2013
            • 5616

            #20
            Originally posted by Geng
            A quick reminder of how we got on last time Warnock managed us vs Fulham

            https://vimeo.com/71976665
            Warnock was hamstrung by Tango and Cash refusing to open the coffers to sign players. He never had a proper chance with us in the Prem and then Uncle Tony sacked him, instead of giving him the transfer window he'd earned. Pointless to harp on about that 6-0. So what?

            Comment

            • James1979
              Silver Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 4857

              #21
              Originally posted by Geng
              A quick reminder of how we got on last time Warnock managed us vs Fulham

              https://vimeo.com/71976665
              Warnock didn't do that bad in the half season he had in the premiership. He got all our away wins that season. Stoke and Everton and wolves. We had rocky December but thought in general we were ok and he was harshly sacked.

              Comment

              • West Acton
                CCG
                • Dec 2009
                • 21475

                #22
                Originally posted by Hubble
                Warnock was hamstrung by Tango and Cash refusing to open the coffers to sign players. He never had a proper chance with us in the Prem and then Uncle Tony sacked him, instead of giving him the transfer window he'd earned. Pointless to harp on about that 6-0. So what?
                So your saying that side he chose was a 6 nil side he selected

                Comment

                • Hubble
                  Postmodernist
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 5616

                  #23
                  Originally posted by West Acton
                  So your saying that side he chose was a 6 nil side he selected
                  Sorry, I don't understand your question.

                  Comment

                  • James1979
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4857

                    #24
                    Warnock did ok in Prem with what we had, stoke, wolves and Everton away were great victories. Fulham was the low point but it was a bit out the blue, whereas Saturday wasn't a great shock to me.

                    Comment

                    • West Acton
                      CCG
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 21475

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Hubble
                      Sorry, I don't understand your question.
                      Your defending the result hubs by offering excuses for the 6 nil outcome or that's how I interrupted you message. I was asking if you thought that side he put out was a team that should have been turned over by six goals

                      Comment

                      • Hubble
                        Postmodernist
                        • Jan 2013
                        • 5616

                        #26
                        Originally posted by West Acton
                        Your defending the result hubs by offering excuses for the 6 nil outcome or that's how I interrupted you message. I was asking if you thought that side he put out was a team that should have been turned over by six goals
                        No West, I wasn't defending the 6-0 defeat, I was putting it into context of Warnock's situation at Rangers after we got promoted. Geng's post "A quick reminder of how we got on last time Warnock managed us vs Fulham" implied (or at least that's how I interpreted it) that because we got caned by Fulham, Warnock was therefore a useless manager.

                        Comment

                        • hal9thou
                          Silver Seat
                          • May 2012
                          • 4258

                          #27
                          At least we all know now that NW was tipped a wink by the powers that be that he wasn't wanted. Like so much else Rs, it was obvious at the time.

                          At this level I would have taken him over JFH any day of the week. That was another no brainer.

                          Comment

                          • Kevin Mcleod
                            Referee
                            • Aug 2013
                            • 17322

                            #28
                            Originally posted by hal9thou
                            At least we all know now that NW was tipped a wink by the powers that be that he wasn't wanted. Like so much else Rs, it was obvious at the time.

                            At this level I would have taken him over JFH any day of the week. That was another no brainer.
                            Warnock is about 98 ain't he, we are trying to build a future, no more quick fixes. This jfh dislike is baffling.

                            Comment

                            • hal9thou
                              Silver Seat
                              • May 2012
                              • 4258

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
                              Warnock is about 98 ain't he, we are trying to build a future, no more quick fixes. This jfh dislike is baffling.
                              Ramsey was sacked because he was deemed unlikely to get us to the play offs. Getting us to the play offs does not imply a rebuild strategy.

                              Re Neil's exit. I seem to remember you were one of those determined to believe the line that was being spun at the time.

                              I don't dislike JFH but I think we'd have had more stability from NW.

                              Comment

                              • Ramsey is god

                                #30
                                move on for fark sake, was 5 years ago. showed he wasn't up to it in the prem.

                                done great for us and has my thanks, but is cringeworthy the way people still bang on about him.

                                Comment

                                Working...