Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Will Ramsey start with no real forward on the bench again?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • knocker
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 4009

    #1

    Will Ramsey start with no real forward on the bench again?

    He's pig headed so wouldn't be surprised.God help him if jet gets injured early.
  • dogsrrs
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2013
    • 6671

    #2
    Well if he names Poltier he's going to look weak , He's made a rod for his own back dammed if he does dammed if he doesn't

    Comment

    • Brian Wilson
      Silver Seat
      • Jul 2009
      • 4400

      #3
      Yes, he will

      Comment

      • West Acton
        CCG
        • Dec 2009
        • 21475

        #4
        Originally posted by dogsrrs
        Well if he names Poltier he's going to look weak , He's made a rod for his own back dammed if he does dammed if he doesn't
        Why??? He played Chery after dissent at Fulham why not name Poulter on bench if fit if he does its win win in my book

        Comment

        • Hoop-du-Jour
          Silver Seat
          • Sep 2013
          • 1415

          #5
          He'll start with JET on the bench and Fer up front-ish. The logic is inescapable, bring JET on for Fer after half an hour and no one can moan about a negative sub.

          A tiny mind thinking in tiny circles...

          Comment

          • QPRDave
            The number 10
            • Mar 2009
            • 32074

            #6
            Is there a match tomorrow? Don't think Ramsey knows, he was off presenting prizes today.
            He might not bother turning up and then we'll start with no striker or manager on the bench!

            Comment

            • dsqpr
              Silver Seat
              • Sep 2012
              • 3433

              #7
              Originally posted by knocker
              He's pig headed so wouldn't be surprised.God help him if jet gets injured early.
              Re: OP: I refuse to believe that anybody could be that stupid. But that doesn't make it so!
              'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.

              Comment

              • Jimmy Floyd Rabbit
                Gold Seat
                • Sep 2012
                • 8957

                #8
                Doing it once is plain stupid, twice is disgraceful. Let's see.

                Comment

                • heatwave
                  Apprentice
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 56

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Hoop-du-Jour
                  He'll start with JET on the bench and Fer up front-ish. The logic is inescapable, bring JET on for Fer after half an hour and no one can moan about a negative sub.

                  A tiny mind thinking in tiny circles...
                  thinking about it... he might actually just do it

                  Comment

                  • brightonr
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10922

                    #10
                    Surely even he couldn't be that stupid. If he is, then I suspect that the fans will make it absolutely clear that they have seen quite enough.

                    Comment

                    • Alanwycombe
                      Silver Seat
                      • Feb 2014
                      • 2215

                      #11
                      Originally posted by dogsrrs
                      Well if he names Poltier he's going to look weak , He's made a rod for his own back dammed if he does dammed if he doesn't
                      Or he could say ok pal, you've shot your mouth off now go show us what you can do. We either get a great performance which will reflect well on Ramsey for being big enough to front it up, or the BFG looks a #### and Ramsey's proved right. Who decided to buy him is what I'd like to know.

                      Comment

                      • 72bus
                        Gold Seat
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 9507

                        #12
                        he'd be a fool not to have a striker on the bench , its got to be polter as i think he's the only one we have fit . but i wouldn't be shocked if he didn't as this bloke just won't be told what to do

                        Comment

                        • heatwave
                          Apprentice
                          • Jul 2015
                          • 56

                          #13
                          Originally posted by 72bus
                          he'd be a fool not to have a striker on the bench , its got to be polter as i think he's the only one we have fit . but i wouldn't be shocked if he didn't as this bloke just won't be told what to do
                          grego-cox?

                          Comment

                          • dogsrrs
                            Gold Seat
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 6671

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Alanwycombe
                            Or he could say ok pal, you've shot your mouth off now go show us what you can do. We either get a great performance which will reflect well on Ramsey for being big enough to front it up, or the BFG looks a #### and Ramsey's proved right. Who decided to buy him is what I'd like to know.
                            You nor any of us have seen enough of Poltier to pass a fair judgement , my point was that Ramsey has lost so many of the fans that some will jump on his back as being weak saying he gave in to pressure , others will say he's a numpty for leaving him out

                            Comment

                            • Alanwycombe
                              Silver Seat
                              • Feb 2014
                              • 2215

                              #15
                              Originally posted by dogsrrs
                              You nor any of us have seen enough of Poltier to pass a fair judgement , my point was that Ramsey has lost so many of the fans that some will jump on his back as being weak saying he gave in to pressure , others will say he's a numpty for leaving him out
                              I've seen him play as much as he has so far this season. Haven't you just made my point for me? Play him or we'll never know - and why buy him? - take him off if he doesn't deliver and Ramsey never has to make the point again.

                              Comment

                              Working...