(Y)unbelievable

[MattyRangers]

I think perch will definitely be back tomorrow matty

Wouldn't surprise me mate but IMO
It would be crazy to change the back 4 after a clean sheet. We did so after Hudds and it all went wrong .

[72bus]

would not change the back four myself . they say keep a winning team. sometimes on here when a player has been out for sometime , posters really build them up to be better than they really are . a recent example was faurlin. i don't think bringing yun back will offer a lot more than kon . i've never come away from a game and said to myself that yun had a great game what a player , he does alright and no more than that for me

[Brian Wilson]

It would be crazy to change the back 4 after a clean sheet. We did so after Hudds and it all went wrong .

100%, gotta give that 4 a chance again

[upperloft]

Yun has been injured all season and Sandro has only just come back from injury.

is he supposed to pick injured players now?

Think your mate said Yun is fit. Picking Konchesy because he playing well.

[AlamoR]

It is because Ramsey is committed to our youth and future that's why he's playing Kpewka ... no wait. Either way, Yun is not much of step up over Konchelsy. Personally, I'd go with Kpewka but I'd be in the minority I think.

[kenthoop]

Konchesky has been class this season. Some people are so blinded by age it's a joke.

[West Acton]

Novel idea but I like my defenders to defend, midfielders to be able to get between the defensive and attacking boxes and my forwards to score goals

Get that right and any team is laughing

[Ginger Ninja]

Wouldn't surprise me mate but IMO
It would be crazy to change the back 4 after a clean sheet. We did so after Hudds and it all went wrong .

Yeah agree with this. Same back 4 has to start again.

[Ginger Ninja]

Konchesky has been class this season. Some people are so blinded by age it's a joke.

Wouldn't say he's been class but definitely has been nowhere near as bad as some have said. And there's no way, IMO, Yun should walk straight back into the squad.

[nasser95]

Novel idea but I like my defenders to defend, midfielders to be able to get between the defensive and attacking boxes and my forwards to score goals

Get that right and any team is laughing

Not really a great thing. Yea they should be able to and all of ours are able to but what is costing us is that they can't do the other stuff well enough at this point.

[Brian Wilson]

Konchesky has been class this season. Some people are so blinded by age it's a joke.

[West Acton]

Not really a great thing. Yea they should be able to and all of ours are able to but what is costing us is that they can't do the other stuff well enough at this point.

Well currently from those three things have Austin who score goals were sorely lacking in the other areas. If you can defend (we can't) control the midfield (we can't) with Austin goals will go very close. Not sure why you would object to that??

[nasser95]

Well currently from those three things have Austin who score goals were sorely lacking in the other areas. If you can defend (we can't) control the midfield (we can't) with Austin goals will go very close. Not sure why you would object to that??

Because just being able to defend from defence means that they won't be able to get it anywhere useful after for example. I say full backs need to attack, forwards need to be able to hold up and run with the ball. Lower league clubs have players who can tackle but can do f all else in defence. There's a reason they are lower league players.

[nasser95]

Well currently from those three things have Austin who score goals were sorely lacking in the other areas. If you can defend (we can't) control the midfield (we can't) with Austin goals will go very close. Not sure why you would object to that??

Also, we have sandro who can do the midfield thing, so can fer and luongo. We have Clint who can clearly defend but is limited by his lack of footballing ability beyond that.

[West Acton]

Because just being able to defend from defence means that they won't be able to get it anywhere useful after for example. I say full backs need to attack, forwards need to be able to hold up and run with the ball. Lower league clubs have players who can tackle but can do f all else in defence. There's a reason they are lower league players.

Perhaps you misunderstand me or I have not explained correctly. Using defence as example first and foremost I want CB OR FB to do their job and do it well once that's achieved that they can worry about adding the extras such as expansive defensive play. Would I like a CB like Rio in his prime who can bring ball out and play with it of course but we're not blessed with those players so if it's a choice of Nedum clearing his lines or getting caught doing something he can't then clear your lines.

I think a few agree with that opinion hence why there over the moon Hill is back as he does what it says on the tin he defends, he heads the ball, he's brave and he puts the ball in row z when required. He don't dance out of defence cause he can't but what's more important in a defender??