Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Our defence is a shambles
Collapse
X
-
"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
How dare you!
here you go, just copied and pasted this from the predictions thread before the match.
Quote Originally Posted by Hoop-du-Jour View Post
Harry says it's about time we got 3 points away from home, sounds like an all out blitz on the Swansea goal is the plan to me.
3-2 to us, again.
Hitman says..........
he said the same before the newcasle game, look how that panned out.
would love it if we took it to swansea but i cant see harry doing it.
most likely play 1 up front with 5 across the middle. go 1 nil down after 20 mins then hoilett and bobby will come off the bench and we will get ra ped on the counter attack.
thats what my crystal ball predicts.
hope im wrong though.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐Comment
-
Our defence is not that bad. Green was our savour. Dunne and Caulker were solid, while Ned and Yun did their part as well. Its the midfield that we are being overrun most of the times. Time and again we gave the ball away too cheaply. And we talk about experience! The hell with experience. Put some younger players in the midfield and let them run for 90 minutes. Put pressure on the opponent. Cannot stand our players looking at an opponent with the ball at his feet and doing nothing. Just try to close him down, put him under pressure, DO SOMETHING!Comment
-
Sums it up quite nicelyOur defence is not that bad. Green was our savour. Dunne and Caulker were solid, while Ned and Yun did their part as well. Its the midfield that we are being overrun most of the times. Time and again we gave the ball away too cheaply. And we talk about experience! The hell with experience. Put some younger players in the midfield and let them run for 90 minutes. Put pressure on the opponent. Cannot stand our players looking at an opponent with the ball at his feet and doing nothing. Just try to close him down, put him under pressure, DO SOMETHING!
I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley BowlesComment
-
AgreeOur defence is not that bad. Green was our savour. Dunne and Caulker were solid, while Ned and Yun did their part as well. Its the midfield that we are being overrun most of the times. Time and again we gave the ball away too cheaply. And we talk about experience! The hell with experience. Put some younger players in the midfield and let them run for 90 minutes. Put pressure on the opponent. Cannot stand our players looking at an opponent with the ball at his feet and doing nothing. Just try to close him down, put him under pressure, DO SOMETHING!Comment
-
27 goals shipped in 14 matches. Thank heavens our defence is solid.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.Comment
-
Agree doesn't make good reading but it isn't purely down to the defence. If the midfield upped their game (which they have done and we don't concede that many goals) it helps our defence. It's no good just blaming the defenders when they are being run ragged because the midfield haven't made it more difficult to get through.I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley BowlesComment
-
Agree. Although this thread amuses me. We've only conceded 2 goals less in the past 7 games than we did in the first 7, even though everyone acknowledges that as a team we are playing much better now than pre-Liverpool, with the only change to the defence bring Rio dropped. So why is the 'midfield don't track back' reason being given now yet before it was all Rio's fault?!Agree doesn't make good reading but it isn't purely down to the defence. If the midfield upped their game (which they have done and we don't concede that many goals) it helps our defence. It's no good just blaming the defenders when they are being run ragged because the midfield haven't made it more difficult to get through.Comment
-
get Mutch back in the midfield as he is younger and presumably more mobile.
As for the defence, Caulker was good last season, as he was whilst at Spurs and out on loan, so something must be wrong with the management and coaching at QPR.Comment
-
But Matty, he was probably carrying an injury, hence his absence for much of the season so far.
He is worth another look now that he is fit again and then we will be better placed to have a more accurate opinion on him.Comment
-
I think he has shown some promise Matty, and we need some younger legs in the midfield in which are present crop of 30-somethings are getting constantly overrun and losing their personal battles. The title of this thread is incorrect - the shambles is in midfield which thus failed to protect the back four sufficiently which lead to the inevitable goals against.Comment
-
Because the defence, in my humble opinion, really is looking decent. ie Isla really getting to grips with Prem and change in position, Dunne solid, Caulker took a few games but starting to look like the future England regular he`s been touted as, Yun settled into prem like a duck to water.Agree. Although this thread amuses me. We've only conceded 2 goals less in the past 7 games than we did in the first 7, even though everyone acknowledges that as a team we are playing much better now than pre-Liverpool, with the only change to the defence bring Rio dropped. So why is the 'midfield don't track back' reason being given now yet before it was all Rio's fault?!
Rio (to me and i`m not anti-Rio) looked like he`d been sat in the crowd and was asked to play last minute.
Really do think we`re missing Sandro and hate to say it but joey just is`nt quick enough so just lets players trot past him.Comment
Comment