Has the arrival of Sir Les affected us for the better?

[SuperHoopNik]

More down to Harry scrapping his new ideas of playing a certain type of football and just going to basics, long ball. Even with long ball we play some good football at times!

[Pie & mash]

Les has nothing to do with the team , Harry has got Hoddle more involved with the 1st team plus the m/f is stronger and dictating play , the side has an all round better ballance hence Austin is playing further forward and reaping the benefit

No, sorry mate, it's all down to Ferdinand's return and NOTHING else!

[dogsrrs]

[QUOTE=Yousef;1345565]I think three important factors are:

1. Getting Sandro fit.
2. After scoring a brace for Chile, Harry believed in Vargas.
3. Bringing Zamora back and giving him an important role to hold the ball and take pressure off

More or less what I said , the bottom line is Harry's involvement with Hoddle .
Makes you wonder what Bond and Jordon actually did for the players

[Olly]

Wouldn't be surprised if Tony had words somewhere too. After West Ham, suddenly it was Rio out and Yun in.

[qblockoompah]

Laughable how HR never gets the credit, so this time round it's down to Les and Hoddle, and last time it was all mclarens doing

[MattyRangers]

Fair play to Harry, we has turned things around since the wet Spam game which was, for many (me included) the straw that broke the camels back in backing him. Seem like a totally new set of players, motivated and really putting in a shift. If Harry took the flack for the poor run, he also deserves the credit for the good run of performances, rough with the smooth n all that.

[Jogo]

Our perfomances changed after Harry was touted for the sack. Bit of motivation was all that was needed.

[dogsrrs]

Laughable how HR never gets the credit, so this time round it's down to Les and Hoddle, and last time it was all mclarens doing

Harry has got to get credit for bringing in Hoddle every manager needs help and Harry got the man he could work with

[West Acton]

Why does it have to be down to les or Hoddle why not down to the manager??

[Nick]

Why does it have to be down to les or Hoddle why not down to the manager??

What do you think WATRB stands for?.... We Ate That Redknapp Ba$tard.

[qpr]

Sir Les will still be offering advice no doubt

[QPRDave]

Credit to Harry and the coaches......Be saying the tea lady should get the credit next!

[stationcafe]

It's hard to say because we're just outsiders speculating.

Maybe Arry & his coaches have had to pull their finger out and drop the complacency?
Maybe the new players are starting to know each other - if you look at the last match almost half the team were basically new to the first team - Yun, Sandro, Isla, Vargas, Fer.
Maybe it's because we've got a fit Zamora leading the front? Or because Rio hasn't played? Or Vargas' spark?
Maybe it's because we now know what our starting 11 looks like?
Maybe it's because our keepers have actually started playing well? Doesn't matter how good the outfielders are, if Green makes a sloppy mistake every game it's gonna be hard to win.
Maybe the mental magician that is Adel forced Arry to do his job with his Daily Mail mind games?

It's hard to say but long may it continue...

[dogsrrs]

When results were going against us and we wasn't playing well the realists said Harry was responcible , surely now the gloves on the other foot we have to say Harry is responcible forthe coaches players and team play give him the overall credit