Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Fabio Borini

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • surrey_hoop
    Silver Seat
    • Jun 2014
    • 1834

    #76
    Originally posted by Hoop-du-Jour
    James Olley ‏@JamesOlley 14m

    Borini's deal to #QPR: Fee agreed with #lfc - £10m rising to £13m - but wages the issue. Player wants £90k-a-wk. Club offered £58k so far.

    Not gonna happen methinks
    Is this bloke reliable? I can't imagine for a minute that he is really demanding 90k a week.....he's probably on just over half that at Liverpool.

    Comment

    • Pie & mash
      Bronze Seat
      • Feb 2014
      • 483

      #77
      Harry just been on SSN, said maybe and that TF was talking to his agent
      I should probably write something insightful here

      Comment

      • Hove Ranger
        Silver Seat
        • Aug 2011
        • 4441

        #78
        Harry also said Diarra still in talks

        Comment

        • stainrodisalegend
          Platinum Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 13624

          #79
          Originally posted by Hoop-du-Jour
          James Olley ‏@JamesOlley 14m

          Borini's deal to #QPR: Fee agreed with #lfc - £10m rising to £13m - but wages the issue. Player wants £90k-a-wk. Club offered £58k so far.

          Not gonna happen methinks
          standard claims he is on 58k at liverpool but we are offering 80k. find it v hard to believe.

          Comment

          • Hoop-du-Jour
            Silver Seat
            • Sep 2013
            • 1415

            #80
            Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
            standard claims he is on 58k at liverpool but we are offering 80k. find it v hard to believe.
            40k a week or do one. And take SWP with you, PLEEEEEEEASE!

            Comment

            • surrey_hoop
              Silver Seat
              • Jun 2014
              • 1834

              #81
              This is clearly ******** - the bloke who tweeted this is the Chief Football Correspondent for the Evening Standard....who ran a story about 10 minutes ago that we are going to offer him 80k a week. This James Olley geezer is just looking for attention.

              Comment

              • Pie & mash
                Bronze Seat
                • Feb 2014
                • 483

                #82
                It's the Standard for fuc*s sake, it's cheaper than the Daily Star
                I should probably write something insightful here

                Comment

                • surrey_hoop
                  Silver Seat
                  • Jun 2014
                  • 1834

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Pie & mash
                  It's the Standard for fuc*s sake, it's cheaper than the Daily Star
                  Right, but the bloke who tweeted that wages were an issue is the Chief Football Correspondent at the Standard....so either his rag is talking shite, or he is.

                  Comment

                  • Hitman34
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 13959

                    #84
                    Originally posted by Pie & mash
                    It's the Standard for fuc*s sake, it's cheaper than the Daily Star
                    James Olley ✔ @JamesOlley

                    Borini's deal to #QPR: Fee agreed with #lfc - £10m rising to £13m - but wages the issue. Player wants £90k-a-wk. Club offered £58k so far.
                    Retweeted by hassan

                    if he wants 90k fark him off. we are talking to ayew as well.
                    nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                    Comment

                    • Pie & mash
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Feb 2014
                      • 483

                      #85
                      Originally posted by surrey_hoop
                      Right, but the bloke who tweeted that wages were an issue is the Chief Football Correspondent at the Standard....so either his rag is talking shite, or he is.
                      I'm suggesting both are
                      I should probably write something insightful here

                      Comment

                      • surrey_hoop
                        Silver Seat
                        • Jun 2014
                        • 1834

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Pie & mash
                        I'm suggesting both are
                        And I'm suggesting that one of them must be wrong.

                        Comment

                        • Pie & mash
                          Bronze Seat
                          • Feb 2014
                          • 483

                          #87
                          Both probably
                          I should probably write something insightful here

                          Comment

                          • Lunar Jetman
                            Silver Seat
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 1380

                            #88
                            Originally posted by surrey_hoop
                            And I'm suggesting that one of them must be wrong.
                            Why can't they both be?

                            Comment

                            • surrey_hoop
                              Silver Seat
                              • Jun 2014
                              • 1834

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Pie & mash
                              Both probably
                              Clearly one of them is wrong.....

                              Comment

                              • surrey_hoop
                                Silver Seat
                                • Jun 2014
                                • 1834

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Lunar Jetman
                                Why can't they both be?
                                Because you can't simultaneously offer one person two different salaries.

                                Comment

                                Working...