Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Remy to Chelsea

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmelanie
    Gold Seat
    • Aug 2011
    • 7525

    #16
    I would like this problem settled one way or the other. If he doesn't want to sign a new contract (without the release clause) then I think we are better off without him. Otherwise every transfer period we are going to have to go through the same scenario as to whether he wants to stay or not and not knowing whether on transfer deadline day he will be gone. You really can't plan like that.

    Comment

    • surrey_hoop
      Silver Seat
      • Jun 2014
      • 1834

      #17
      The other factor of course is that wage demands are no object to Chelsea either - they'll happily pay him £80,000 a week to sit on the bench.

      Comment

      • stainrodisalegend
        Platinum Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 13624

        #18
        Originally posted by jmelanie
        I would like this problem settled one way or the other. If he doesn't want to sign a new contract (without the release clause) then I think we are better off without him. Otherwise every transfer period we are going to have to go through the same scenario as to whether he wants to stay or not and not knowing whether on transfer deadline day he will be gone. You really can't plan like that.
        Better off without him? If Remy goes, we are relegated. Period.

        Comment

        • surrey_hoop
          Silver Seat
          • Jun 2014
          • 1834

          #19
          Originally posted by jmelanie
          I would like this problem settled one way or the other. If he doesn't want to sign a new contract (without the release clause) then I think we are better off without him. Otherwise every transfer period we are going to have to go through the same scenario as to whether he wants to stay or not and not knowing whether on transfer deadline day he will be gone. You really can't plan like that.
          True, but I would feel much better selling him in January when he will've almost certainly scored some important goals for us, than a week before the start of the season. Selling your best player is inconvenient at any time, but some times are more troublesome than others.

          Comment

          • stainrodisalegend
            Platinum Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 13624

            #20
            Ray Wilkins has gone on record as saying he knew that selling your best player would hurt (Les Ferdinand) but what he had not realised was that it would relegate us. OK we cd argue that his shockingly bad signings - way worse than anything Mark Hughes ever did - played a big part in that but think our chances of staying up are as closely tied to keeping hold of Remy as they were then to keeping Ferdinand. Would love to be proved wrong but just don't see us having the nous and the skill and pulling power - let alone the sheer cash - to get a player of comparable ability.

            Comment

            • twranger
              On the posh naughty step
              • Mar 2009
              • 10472

              #21
              Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
              Better off without him? If Remy goes, we are relegated. Period.
              ..talking that kind of negativity, it probably is, yes!

              Comment

              • surrey_hoop
                Silver Seat
                • Jun 2014
                • 1834

                #22
                Stainrod, completely agree...you can already see the similarities in our fortunes between the current team with Remy and the team of the mid 90's with Ferdinand (another top class striker who we sold cheaply, albeit in different circumstances.) There is no question that our chances of being relegated will rise dramatically if Remy goes....no other club who will be in the bottom 6 or 7 has a 15-20 goal a season striker on their books, which gives us a huge advantage. It would be typical Chelsea to **** us up by putting our best player on their bench.

                Comment

                • Burnside
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 895

                  #23
                  Chelsea have of squad of 60 players. Borrow a couple. We will be fine.

                  Comment

                  • twranger
                    On the posh naughty step
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10472

                    #24
                    ...oh we do love a bit scaremongering on here and then flogging it to death. After all this, bet it never happens!

                    Comment

                    • surrey_hoop
                      Silver Seat
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 1834

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Burnside
                      Chelsea have of squad of 60 players. Borrow a couple. We will be fine.
                      They'll offer £8.5million and Remy will leave - it'll be as straightforward as that (if true.) I don't think we'll be in much of a position to negotiate with them.

                      Comment

                      • jfish
                        Silver Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 3948

                        #26
                        I'm sure the club are aware this could happen up until deadline day. We will have our targets if he ends up going.

                        Probably won't be as good as remy but better than what we have.

                        Comment

                        • Will M
                          Silver Seat
                          • May 2012
                          • 2737

                          #27
                          Remy doesn't want to be a bench warmer, and Mourinho slated Lukaku off for basically refusing to do that. I can't see it myself.

                          Comment

                          • twranger
                            On the posh naughty step
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 10472

                            #28
                            ..but is hasn't happened yet......doubt it will!

                            Comment

                            • surrey_hoop
                              Silver Seat
                              • Jun 2014
                              • 1834

                              #29
                              Originally posted by twranger
                              ...oh we do love a bit scaremongering on here and then flogging it to death. After all this, bet it never happens!
                              tw, it isn't scaremongering...it's common sense - losing Remy would be a hammer blow to our chances of survival. Of course we all hope it doesn't happen, but it makes too much sense to be simply rumour.

                              Comment

                              • Burnside
                                Bronze Seat
                                • Jul 2013
                                • 895

                                #30
                                Originally posted by surrey_hoop
                                They'll offer £8.5million and Remy will leave - it'll be as straightforward as that (if true.) I don't think we'll be in much of a position to negotiate with them.
                                Yep and I bet if we said chuck Bamford and another in they would.be.more than happy.

                                Comment

                                Working...