Ross McCormack

[stan_bowles]

Gonna need strikers with Johnson and Zamora injury prone and need to be shot of.

Do you reckon he could be a possible back up,especially after a great season?.

[maidstone_hoop]

definitely a decent target and one who should be looked along with deeney, rhodes, bamford and grabban imo

[qblockoompah]

Doubt he'd come as back up. Zamora is clearly fit now also. I'd go for the Peterborough lad if we're looking for back up

[winalotto]

Johnson will be gone, maybe Zamora to , he'll want to play more now at this stage of his career, i can see him at another championship club, McCormack definitely prem player and would strengthen the squad, can play up front or off a front man can play a wide role to

[stan_bowles]

I said back up if Harry went for a more defensive 4-5-1,but think he would be a good partner for Austin if 4-4-2.

Him or Rhodes.

[qblockoompah]

I said back up if Harry went for a more defensive 4-5-1,but think he would be a good partner for Austin if 4-4-2.

Him or Rhodes.

Defo cheaper than Rhodes and is prem quality IMO

[QPRDave]

Patrick Bamford?

[Fordy]

Would love to sign Rhodes, great finisher. Austin, Rhodes, Lambert and Bamford on loan with Zamora making the odd cameo.

[QPR1234]

rhodes is a good player but just feel mccormack will be cheaper and likely a better option next to charlie if we play 2 up top. if we dont i can't see a reason for us to pay 8-10m for rhodes and him sit on the bench

[kron-1664]

rhodes is a good player but just feel mccormack will be cheaper and likely a better option next to charlie if we play 2 up top. if we dont i can't see a reason for us to pay 8-10m for rhodes and him sit on the bench

i wanted rhodes but i reckon u r right McCormack would be a great signing

[qblockoompah]

rhodes is a good player but just feel mccormack will be cheaper and likely a better option next to charlie if we play 2 up top. if we dont i can't see a reason for us to pay 8-10m for rhodes and him sit on the bench

Very good point

[Yousef]

It's good to sign proven Championship players, but again we have to remember not to sign too many from the Championship like Norwich. We need to have the right balance between them and the RIGHT Premier League experienced players.

[QPR1234]

It's good to sign proven Championship players, but again we have to remember not to sign too many from the Championship like Norwich. We need to have the right balance between them and the RIGHT Premier League experienced players.

agreed but there are quite a few who are good enough and more importantly hungry enough. We also have to buy long term. Players who are a gamble in the prem but a cert in the championship. Build for the future not just for the next 12 months.

[Yousef]

agreed but there are quite a few who are good enough and more importantly hungry enough. We also have to buy long term. Players who are a gamble in the prem but a cert in the championship. Build for the future not just for the next 12 months.

Definitely build for beyond even 2 years. A blend of young/hungry players (2-3 years contract) and experinced players of not mora than 32 years old who can deliver their experience to the young players (with one year contracts and sensible wages).

[dave58]

Not sure McCormack is the right one but deffo need a couple of strikers A.J. def out B.Z. maybe offer a pay as you play deal