Does that mean Benny back to spurs - hope not!!
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Danny rose sending off
Collapse
X
-
Don't bother mate . It would appear some posters just want to **** their pants every 5 minutes and post absolute drivelComment
-
-
Mem I'm not just talking about your post. I know that a forum is a place for debate but it's not hard to work out why this site is going down hill with the amount of utter ******** that's posted on here on a daily basis .Comment
-
Comment
-
on the theme of a straight red? Wasn't even a foul - got the ball. linesman was up with play and should have seen that. Terrible decision.
However, Dawson's goal was offside. and this is what bothers me about this whole "interfering with play" rubbish:
Adebayor was off. He was half a yard off. Ball comes flying in...Hart sees Adebayor going for it so instinctively he's looking out for his play. It's gone past both of them and fell to Dawson at the back post. If Adebayor wasn't there then hart would have been able to track the ball a bit more and perhaps (perhaps...) have gotten to it before Dawson. The fact that Dawson was onside means nothing if the goalie is being drawn to a player in an offside position.
Rant over.
Hoep BAE stays. Can't see him going. Spurs surely have more than Danny Rose at the back- where they hoping to go a whole season with only 1 man in that position? they must have someone else.Comment
-
nothing wrong with mem's post,he was just putting a question out there!Comment
Comment