Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Danny rose sending off

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mem
    Referee
    • Aug 2009
    • 2376

    #1

    Danny rose sending off

    Does that mean Benny back to spurs - hope not!!
  • Greg1882
    Silver Seat
    • May 2012
    • 4704

    #2
    Ffs

    Comment

    • winalotto
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 5524

      #3
      of course not why would it, im pretty sure Sherwood said he was here for the season, and they have cover at left back , lets all be happy and relaxed...

      Comment

      • Greg1882
        Silver Seat
        • May 2012
        • 4704

        #4
        Originally posted by winalotto
        of course not why would it, im pretty sure Sherwood said he was here for the season, and they have cover at left back , lets all be happy and relaxed...
        Don't bother mate . It would appear some posters just want to **** their pants every 5 minutes and post absolute drivel

        Comment

        • martyhoop
          Bronze Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 464

          #5
          Was never a pen in the first place rose got he ball I'm sure spuds will appeal it.

          Comment

          • fisnik
            Silver Seat
            • Aug 2012
            • 1224

            #6
            Straight red?

            Comment

            • Mem
              Referee
              • Aug 2009
              • 2376

              #7
              Originally posted by Greg1882
              Don't bother mate . It would appear some posters just want to **** their pants every 5 minutes and post absolute drivel
              That's the whole purpose of a forum, for discussion and debate - what a Wally you are!

              Comment

              • stan_bowles
                CCG
                • Mar 2009
                • 8391

                #8
                And the amount of stick i got for some of my posts lol.

                Comment

                • Greg1882
                  Silver Seat
                  • May 2012
                  • 4704

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mem
                  That's the whole purpose of a forum, for discussion and debate - what a Wally you are!
                  Mem I'm not just talking about your post. I know that a forum is a place for debate but it's not hard to work out why this site is going down hill with the amount of utter ******** that's posted on here on a daily basis .

                  Comment

                  • twranger
                    On the posh naughty step
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10472

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mem
                    That's the whole purpose of a forum, for discussion and debate - what a Wally you are!
                    Exactly..for discussion and debate.......not for people to start threads that wreak of ignorance and panic when the answer is already known!!!!

                    Comment

                    • QPRDave
                      The number 10
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 32065

                      #11
                      Calm down chaps......he's only speculating. Tbh it was the 1st thing i thought when i heard about the red. I'd rather just get the window shut asap as far as BAE is concerned

                      Comment

                      • ollyhoops
                        Gold Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 6013

                        #12
                        If he goes then he goes

                        Comment

                        • QPR_NW10
                          Silver Seat
                          • May 2011
                          • 2659

                          #13
                          on the theme of a straight red? Wasn't even a foul - got the ball. linesman was up with play and should have seen that. Terrible decision.

                          However, Dawson's goal was offside. and this is what bothers me about this whole "interfering with play" rubbish:
                          Adebayor was off. He was half a yard off. Ball comes flying in...Hart sees Adebayor going for it so instinctively he's looking out for his play. It's gone past both of them and fell to Dawson at the back post. If Adebayor wasn't there then hart would have been able to track the ball a bit more and perhaps (perhaps...) have gotten to it before Dawson. The fact that Dawson was onside means nothing if the goalie is being drawn to a player in an offside position.

                          Rant over.

                          Hoep BAE stays. Can't see him going. Spurs surely have more than Danny Rose at the back- where they hoping to go a whole season with only 1 man in that position? they must have someone else.

                          Comment

                          • Yousef
                            Gold Seat
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 9553

                            #14
                            Hope not.
                            QPR fan since1987

                            @yousef_qpr

                            Comment

                            • march56
                              Silver Seat
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 1275

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Greg1882
                              Mem I'm not just talking about your post. I know that a forum is a place for debate but it's not hard to work out why this site is going down hill with the amount of utter ******** that's posted on here on a daily basis .
                              nothing wrong with mem's post,he was just putting a question out there!

                              Comment

                              Working...