Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

QPR face record-breaking punishment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LewisQPR
    Bronze Seat
    • Jul 2013
    • 274

    #1

    QPR face record-breaking punishment

    Just read that QPR may be getting fined £60million by the financial fair play rules as we have spent so much in past year, utter joke.
    Why pick on the smaller teams, man city are the ****ing worst and they get away with it... Always Agasint the mighty R'ss

    Source: http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport/...80million.html
    Last edited by LewisQPR; 17-11-2013, 01:47 AM.
    Loyal QPR fan
    Season Ticket Holder!
  • Macca
    Silver Seat
    • Apr 2012
    • 4047

    #2
    The Mail is as bad as the sun newspaper talks ballocks most of the time, Chelsea Man city and a few others are the worst culprits than anybody else.

    Comment

    • californiahoop
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 4932

      #3
      I am impressed that so few people are jumping up and down regarding this, I was going to put the link up but decided against it. I think we are beginning to learn how to sift out bull....
      Kept the faith!

      Comment

      • qprdel
        Bronze Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 350

        #4
        The way i read it is that IF we posted a loss of £80 million this year it would cost £60million.
        As we cleared a lot of the dead wood and high earners i doubt it will be anywhere near that, still dont let facts get in the way of a good headline.

        Comment

        • Rangers77
          Platinum Seat
          • Aug 2012
          • 11808

          #5
          I imagine this is hyped up boll ox. But if it contains a shred of truth then the damage done to our club by those overpaid
          f acking sc umbags is worse than getting us relegated. And still they all 'earn' money elsewhere, Hughesless included. It makes you weep with anger.

          Comment

          • qprdel
            Bronze Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 350

            #6
            I am sure Tony will sort some nice sponsorship deals before the the deadline.

            Comment

            • Qprnw10
              Bronze Seat
              • Apr 2012
              • 395

              #7
              Usually I don't pay any attention to the daily FAIL in regards to football but, I doubt this is a story they would have written without something in it!

              Comment

              • THE CAT
                Bronze Seat
                • Nov 2012
                • 630

                #8
                Originally posted by qprdel
                I am sure Tony will sort some nice sponsorship deals before the the deadline.
                Even if he does that will not affect this year's loss as it would have to be spread out over the length of the sponsorship deal.

                We are likely to get clobbered with this and also have the possibility of a transfer embargo in place if we do not conform.

                Everyone seems to think there are "loopholes" that we can take advantage of and it will all be ok. Not really the case as I have read that the FA have made it quite watertight and difficult to manipulate.

                Comment

                • West Acton
                  CCG
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 21475

                  #9
                  Originally posted by qprdel
                  I am sure Tony will sort some nice sponsorship deals before the the deadline.
                  Exactly Air Asia or Amit's company do a stadium sponsorship and there is the new kit sponsorship end of season plenty of ways of bringing money in.

                  I also am not convinced the loss is as bad as the media make out. Had we been lumping money on transfer fees then I could get my head around it but most signings were on frees with a decent wage but most of these players have now left, yes we may be still contributing towards wages but if the article is correct and we are doing 100k a week covering wages then I think we have done an exceptional job getting it down to that level given the same paper was suggesting there were two of three players on 100k a week alone so if all the shower are now just cost us £100k with the bulk out of contract come May then that less then £3mil between now and May. A lot of money but a whole lot better then the proclaimers of doom were saying this time last year

                  Comment

                  • West Acton
                    CCG
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 21475

                    #10
                    Originally posted by THE CAT
                    Everyone seems to think there are "loopholes" that we can take advantage of and it will all be ok. Not really the case as I have read that the FA have made it quite watertight and difficult to manipulate.
                    I never thought it was an FA rule mate I thought it was the Football League ruling??

                    Comment

                    • qprdel
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 350

                      #11
                      Originally posted by THE CAT
                      Even if he does that will not affect this year's loss as it would have to be spread out over the length of the sponsorship deal.

                      We are likely to get clobbered with this and also have the possibility of a transfer embargo in place if we do not conform.

                      Everyone seems to think there are "loopholes" that we can take advantage of and it will all be ok. Not really the case as I have read that the FA have made it quite watertight and difficult to manipulate.
                      Sure i read somewhere the accounts are as of January 2014 so still plenty of time

                      Comment

                      • THE CAT
                        Bronze Seat
                        • Nov 2012
                        • 630

                        #12
                        Originally posted by West Acton
                        I never thought it was an FA rule mate I thought it was the Football League ruling??
                        Yeah my mistake, think it's actually a UEFA ruling.

                        We are only allowed to make an £8m loss for this season and if we don't we will have a transfer embargo in place from 1st Jan 2015 and possible fine

                        Comment

                        • W12_Ranger
                          Platinum Seat
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 11447

                          #13
                          The content of this article from this rag doesn't even warrant a discussion.

                          Comment

                          • DeepcutHoop
                            Gold Seat
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 6965

                            #14
                            I thought we'd all just prepared for us to get stung by the FFP rules, as there was no way we were going to be able to play by them.

                            Comment

                            • Yousef
                              Gold Seat
                              • Jul 2009
                              • 9553

                              #15
                              Don't think it is ture.
                              QPR fan since1987

                              @yousef_qpr

                              Comment

                              Working...