Harry Redknapp

[WeAreQPR12]

Right, I want answers.

We've slated Hughes and rightly so, but why does Redknapp get little to no criticism?

Also can someone explain to me why he dropped Holliet against Villa?
The only way I can see it, was because he wanted to play a more defensive lineup.

Also for me a big part of our improvement was the decision to drop Mackie but because he did this at the same time as adel, we all think were a better side without adel.
Adel should be starting and Holliet, we need goals and we need to create chances, both player should be starting.

Holliet and townsend would scare 90% of fullbacks on current form so I blame harry for not picking up more points.

He has had Remy and Samba to add to what is a decent squad and yet he hasn't done a great deal better than Hughes imo.

This will come as a negative thread, but for me I couldn't care less if we keep harry, probably one of the most overrated managers I can remember, and I blame the press for this because he does have a sense of humour and is easy to talk too! Think we need to look beyond this!

[QPRDave]

Did we not play well again in the 1st half at Villa? We didn't take our chances if we had we'd have been comfortable.

[Shania]

Please no, Adel from the start.

[knocker]

Right, I want answers.

We've slated Hughes and rightly so, but why does Redknapp get little to no criticism?

Also can someone explain to me why he dropped Holliet against Villa?
The only way I can see it, was because he wanted to play a more defensive lineup.

Also for me a big part of our improvement was the decision to drop Mackie but because he did this at the same time as adel, we all think were a better side without adel.
Adel should be starting and Holliet, we need goals and we need to create chances, both player should be starting.

Holliet and townsend would scare 90% of fullbacks on current form so I blame harry for not picking up more points.

He has had Remy and Samba to add to what is a decent squad and yet he hasn't done a great deal better than Hughes imo.

This will come as a negative thread, but for me I couldn't care less if we keep harry, probably one of the most overrated managers I can remember, and I blame the press for this because he does have a sense of humour and is easy to talk too! Think we need to look beyond this!

You're always so cheerful .

[W12_Ranger]

Right, I want answers.

We've slated Hughes and rightly so, but why does Redknapp get little to no criticism?

Also can someone explain to me why he dropped Holliet against Villa?
The only way I can see it, was because he wanted to play a more defensive lineup.

Also for me a big part of our improvement was the decision to drop Mackie but because he did this at the same time as adel, we all think were a better side without adel.
Adel should be starting and Holliet, we need goals and we need to create chances, both player should be starting.

Holliet and townsend would scare 90% of fullbacks on current form so I blame harry for not picking up more points.

He has had Remy and Samba to add to what is a decent squad and yet he hasn't done a great deal better than Hughes imo.

This will come as a negative thread, but for me I couldn't care less if we keep harry, probably one of the most overrated managers I can remember, and I blame the press for this because he does have a sense of humour and is easy to talk too! Think we need to look beyond this!

Can't argue with any off that.

[Shania]

Decent squad,yes. But to some extent; still Queens Park Strangers.

[Ed the Ball]

Right, I want answers.

We've slated Hughes and rightly so, but why does Redknapp get little to no criticism?

Also can someone explain to me why he dropped Holliet against Villa?
The only way I can see it, was because he wanted to play a more defensive lineup.

Also for me a big part of our improvement was the decision to drop Mackie but because he did this at the same time as adel, we all think were a better side without adel.
Adel should be starting and Holliet, we need goals and we need to create chances, both player should be starting.

Holliet and townsend would scare 90% of fullbacks on current form so I blame harry for not picking up more points.

He has had Remy and Samba to add to what is a decent squad and yet he hasn't done a great deal better than Hughes imo.

This will come as a negative thread, but for me I couldn't care less if we keep harry, probably one of the most overrated managers I can remember, and I blame the press for this because he does have a sense of humour and is easy to talk too! Think we need to look beyond this!

You are kidding right?....

[Shania]

You are kidding right?....

He must be. But I respect his opinion.

[superhoop67]

I can see were you're coming from , but could you trust our owners to make a shrewd managerial appointment or a popular choice to keep there profile up with the press ,so i think they will stick

[Jeems]

Since HR tookover we are currently midtable in the formtable. Problem is we are still playing catch up as the initial gap was so big!

[Factamondo]

hughes was the catastrophic c unt who got us into this mess....arry at least is giving us a fighting chance!

[superhoop67]

Since HR tookover we are currently midtable in the formtable. Problem is we are still playing catch up as the initial gap was so big!

he knew what had to be done when he took the job on , so he has failed

[W12_Ranger]

Since HR tookover we are currently midtable in the formtable. Problem is we are still playing catch up as the initial gap was so big!

Gap is still what it was when he first took over

[Factamondo]

i respect everyones opinions but i say a tad buffoonery here!

[silvercue]

QPR won't attract the top managers, so Harry is a very decent appointment for us. It was always going to be a tall order to keep us up, which unfortunately I think he will fail to do.