Originally posted by surrey_hoop
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
surrey_hoop
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by surrey_hoop View PostNot entirely sure who you're arguing with, as I have already agreed in an earlier post that the stewarding at QPR is absolutely #### poor, and honestly amongst some of the worst in the Top 2 divisions.
You are wrong however in your assertion that "....Their purpose is to direct people to their seat, end of." Their other purpose is to assist in preventing crowd trouble in conjunction with the police (who can't be in every section of the ground, unlike stewards), and to stop fans invading the pitch before, during and after a game. I think it's fair to say that they failed miserably on both counts against Birmingham.
Regardless, you're suggestion that Rangers fans should police other Rangers fans is probably one of the most stupid things I've read on this site.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Floyd Rabbit View PostCalm down ya big poof
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lymehoop View Postwhat do you think the stewards are doing at the moment, do you think they have law degrees. Their purpose is to direct people to their seat, end of. Any problems in the home ends should be dealt with by the police, not someone who has no English and has just arrived via the back of a lorry
You are wrong however in your assertion that "....Their purpose is to direct people to their seat, end of." Their other purpose is to assist in preventing crowd trouble in conjunction with the police (who can't be in every section of the ground, unlike stewards), and to stop fans invading the pitch before, during and after a game. I think it's fair to say that they failed miserably on both counts against Birmingham.
Regardless, you're suggestion that Rangers fans should police other Rangers fans is probably one of the most stupid things I've read on this site.
Leave a comment:
-
what do you think the stewards are doing at the moment, do you think they have law degrees. Their purpose is to direct people to their seat, end of. Any problems in the home ends should be dealt with by the police, not someone who has no English and has just arrived via the back of a lorry
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lymehoop View Postwhat a pillockLast edited by surrey_hoop; 07-03-2016, 01:07 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
surrey_hoop
Originally posted by lymehoop View Postyou change companies and the same stewards change too. You can solve this by returning to the old days, when Rangers fans stewarded Rangers fans. Just have the police and a token amount of stewards police the away fans.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by surrey_hoop View Post...especially when you are admitting that some posters are fair game.
Furthermore (and again, I repeat), if your accusation of uneven-handedness were really true (for myself at least), then I would not be pulling you up over this when I actually agree with much actual content of your arguments (minus the insults). Furthermore still, I also agree with a lot of Kirill's views about the Board etc. So, again, this is purely about you abiding by forums rules. No more, no less.
You obviously can't seem to grasp that basic concept though, so that's all from me on the subject as I've no intention of going round and round in circles with you. And I know how much you like getting the last word, so you're welcome to it mate
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Stanley View PostSpot on, and you always will be as long as you continue to behave the way you do. And maybe one day the penny might drop that this has ZERO to do with your actual opinions and EVERYTHING to do with following a few simple forum rules of respecting your fellow-posters' opinions, regardless of how much you might disagree with them.
The irony is I actually agree with much of what you post minus the ad-hominem; and you should know by now that arguments are only weakened when resorting to that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by surrey_hoop View PostWe're fair game Kirill, you know that.
The irony is I actually agree with much of what you post minus the ad-hominem; and you should know by now that arguments are only weakened when resorting to that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hubble View PostSurrey, you're coming across as a bit 21st Century schizoid, man.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kirill View PostGlad to see mods cracking down on ad hominem, as long as they are going to be as intolerant of ad hominem directed AGAINST inconvenient posters like SurreyHoop, Hitman, me and so on :think:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Stanley View PostOnce again:
I'll try and spell it out again for you. It's nothing to do with what the thread is about. It's about YOUR apparent inability to accept other opinions that don't accord with your own, without resorting to ad hominem.Last edited by surrey_hoop; 15-01-2016, 12:16 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: