Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

MARSHY gone but not forgotten

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MattyRangers
    Slimmer of The Year
    • Jun 2011
    • 24914

    #46
    Originally posted by MarlowR
    I'm Marshy!
    You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

    Comment

    • QPRICO
      Apprentice
      • Jun 2011
      • 157

      #47
      marshyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, no chavez and now not you....time for a monkey revolution. beware our elderly wise ourang-outangs....

      Comment

      • twranger
        On the posh naughty step
        • Mar 2009
        • 10472

        #48
        Originally posted by vblockranger
        He was a berk..my worlds a better place this morning without him :-)
        ...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....

        Comment

        • vblockranger
          • Mar 2009
          • 15218

          #49
          Originally posted by twranger
          ...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
          you checked the spelling in the thread yet?

          Comment

          • QPRICO
            Apprentice
            • Jun 2011
            • 157

            #50
            Originally posted by twranger
            ...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
            EXACTLY my thought (spelling correction turned off, i warn you)... i want marshy back, he s a harmless qpr fan no need for banning, this is the democratic republic of north qpr...not a faschist website...deep, ok deep deep down marshy is a good caring fan...and i want him back

            Comment

            • twranger
              On the posh naughty step
              • Mar 2009
              • 10472

              #51
              Originally posted by vblockranger
              you checked the spelling in the thread yet?
              Eh? .................................................. ...Oh, you think I'm shallow, as well as you...ah,got it....! Veeery good!

              Comment

              • NW_Hoopz
                NO ....... I'm not Phil Mitchell
                • May 2011
                • 6419

                #52
                Originally posted by Kirill
                He was abusive to the last, he just could not help it, that is why his ban was expedited. Some people just might get carried away sometimes, but to him insulting fellow-posters seems to come naturally. And since then we have received several long e-mails from him that have not done him any favours, either.
                Exactly, didn't even have the decency to wait for the poll results before BULLYING other people AGAIN

                Originally posted by madara
                I think Marshy improved his manners and was wrongly banned. He did contribute to this forum by posting lots of interesting thoughts and links to news I would not have read otherwise. I do not remember what he did in the past but the last few weeks he was a good poster IMO and therefore he should be judged by that. He probably got infarcations points before but served them so that is in the past.

                The last few threads he started were good. Yet people attacked him, insulting him, going offtopic, ridiculed him again and again. These posters did not seem to get infarction points even though they broke the rules. And Marshy was banned. Is that fair? No.

                I hope whoever voted for him to get banned did not do so because they disagreed with him or because of all of his threads that got hijacked. That would be a shame and IMO unjust.

                Just because Marshy thinks that maybe Mackie should be tested as a CM does not mean it is meant to be inflammatory. If people take it the wrong way it is under no circumstances Marshys fault. To think otherwise is IMO wrong.


                Bit early for the chemicals ain't it ?

                Originally posted by DeepcutHoop
                People have been far more so, just not for such a prolonged period, or so deliberately.

                His own fault he's gone, it's just the manner in which it was done which was distasteful IMO.

                The gloating is expected but fairly crass too.
                But he didn't even wait for the poll results, just resorted to type !

                Anyone who couldn't see him for what he was is 'clueless' ( to quote his own words )

                And that is another MYTH BUSTED
                "Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
                For us that would mean around 29k."


                QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm

                Comment

                • QPR71
                  Silver Seat
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 3055

                  #53
                  Originally posted by NW_Hoopz
                  Exactly, didn't even have the decency to wait for the poll results before BULLYING other people AGAIN





                  Bit early for the chemicals ain't it ?



                  But he didn't even wait for the poll results, just resorted to type !

                  Anyone who couldn't see him for what he was is 'clueless' ( to quote his own words )

                  And that is another MYTH BUSTED
                  i thought it was destroyed, dismissed simpletons and if we dont play adel we will lose at sunderland and be relegated. Fact!...because i analyse the game unlike most here.

                  Comment

                  • NW_Hoopz
                    NO ....... I'm not Phil Mitchell
                    • May 2011
                    • 6419

                    #54
                    Originally posted by QPR71
                    i thought it was destroyed, dismissed simpletons
                    and if we dont play adel we will lose at sunderland and be relegated. Fact!...because i analyse the game unlike most here.
                    You could be right, it could be MYTH DESTROYED but unlike Marshy, I can't be arshed trawling though old posts to see who's correct ;-}
                    "Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
                    For us that would mean around 29k."


                    QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm

                    Comment

                    • brightonr
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 10922

                      #55
                      Originally posted by twranger
                      ...and your world is effected for the better by some random bloke on a football forum who is now banned - that makes your world better does it? Wow, that's some shallow world you must inhabit!....
                      Originally posted by vblockranger
                      you checked the spelling in the thread yet?
                      Vblock, you appear to have missed an opportunity. It might be a while before you get another.

                      Comment

                      • vblockranger
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 15218

                        #56
                        Originally posted by brightonr
                        Vblock, you appear to have missed an opportunity. It might be a while before you get another.
                        :rage:

                        Comment

                        Working...