Mackie can't play for 'Angeland, he's already been capped :pleasantsuprise:
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mackie for Hangeland
Collapse
X
-
tumbleweed1.jpgOriginally posted by 12321 View PostMackie can't play for 'Angeland, he's already been capped :pleasantsuprise:
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
-
That could be. But again, the players would have signed for the wrong reasons.Originally posted by swede View PostIf we still had Flavio here he could`ve had Naomi or Heidi as co-negotiaters. Then we would`ve had a couple of signings by now.
On the other hand, we are getting used to that now..
QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
-
Not to Fulham it wouldn't.Originally posted by zeberdee View PostWhat about swapping Bosingwa or Park for Hangeland ?
Two highly paid underperformers not even starting games.
Would make more sense from a football perspective than swapping Mackie who actually plays and contributes to the team.
Comment
-
I hear people at the ground come up with similar quotes. One the other week even said, and I quote, "if we had 11 Jamie Mackies we would be top of the league." What they actually mean by that is if we had 11 players of Adel's ability and Mackie's puff we wd be top of the league. Which might be true. 11 actual Jamie Mackies and we wd struggle in the Championship. Because so many of our players are so lazy, some of our fans have exaggerated the qualities of Mackie because he is a trier and a decent bloke.
Comment
Comment