Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Interesting analysis ......

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • abbeylands
    Bronze Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 280

    #1

    Interesting analysis ......

    Latest news coverage, email, free stock quotes, live scores and video are just the beginning. Discover more every day at Yahoo!
    Remember Gillard!!
  • vblockranger
    • Mar 2009
    • 15218

    #2
    ouch that didnt pull any punches for Hughes did it? "Basic stuff that a premier league manager should be getting right"

    Comment

    • QPRDave
      The number 10
      • Mar 2009
      • 32079

      #3
      So thats it then is it??......We might as well hire the bloke that made this vid......It's all too simple to explain it away that easily, I can't believe our management team haven't looked at this, as the bloke says basics.

      Comment

      • johnp
        Apprentice
        • Jun 2009
        • 174

        #4
        We shouldn't play Hoilett, Taraabt and Cisse in the same line up. All are loose cannons so we'll never keep any shape.

        Comment

        • QPRDave
          The number 10
          • Mar 2009
          • 32079

          #5
          I think most will agree AT is at his best when allowed to roam, so wouldn't he be better off in the hole behind the striker so we could then keep the shape in the midfield? The only thing is this prob wouldn't give Ale a start but Mackie or SWP

          Comment

          • MattyRangers
            Slimmer of The Year
            • Jun 2011
            • 24914

            #6
            Originally posted by johnp
            We shouldn't play Hoilett, Taraabt and Cisse in the same line up. All are loose cannons so we'll never keep any shape.
            All about opinions mate, but in mine, we should certainly be starting our 3 most creative players. Without Tarbs Cisse & Hoilet I fail to see where any goals would come from? As for "loose cannons" - Cisse is, undoubtedly, but cant really seehow Tarbs or Hoilet can be classed as that at all?
            You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

            Comment

            • QPR_NW10
              Silver Seat
              • May 2011
              • 2659

              #7
              i agree with what that guy said. very good analysis on AT. however, it's not the full team and plenty of other things need addressing too.

              Comment

              • Stanley
                Guest
                • Mar 2009
                • 23693

                #8
                Bloke's talking bowlocks. Junior covered Adel when he moved inside.

                Comment

                • MYU
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 43466

                  #9
                  Originally posted by QPRDave
                  So thats it then is it??......We might as well hire the bloke that made this vid......It's all too simple to explain it away that easily, I can't believe our management team haven't looked at this, as the bloke says basics.
                  This guy will cost our club fortunes. :rage:

                  Comment

                  • johnp
                    Apprentice
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 174

                    #10
                    I would still keep one of these back as an impact sub. we need to start from a solid base. Obviously we lack defenders who are good in the air (apart from Nelsen) - hopefully that will get rectified in January. I think Diakite, Granero & Faurlin should all play, leaving Taraabt, Cisse and Zamora as the front three. I would hold Hoilett back.

                    Comment

                    • jmelanie
                      Gold Seat
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 7525

                      #11
                      Originally posted by MattyRangers
                      All about opinions mate, but in mine, we should certainly be starting our 3 most creative players. Without Tarbs Cisse & Hoilet I fail to see where any goals would come from? As for "loose cannons" - Cisse is, undoubtedly, but cant really seehow Tarbs or Hoilet can be classed as that at all?
                      I don't think Cisse got sent off much before he came to Rangers. I would say he is eccentric (or a character) but would not necessarily call him a loose cannon.

                      Comment

                      • johnp
                        Apprentice
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 174

                        #12
                        Btw - by 'loose cannon' I meant 'couldn't be relied upon to keep a team shape, defend etc'

                        Comment

                        Working...