Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Poor Park

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bonheurjh
    Silver Seat
    • Jul 2012
    • 3764

    #1

    Poor Park

    His feet were on butter shoes.

    slips and slips and slips.

    some few countable killer passes but all of them gone in vain.

    No effect at all.


    Sorry for him but we need change now
  • Gtleighsr3
    CCG
    • Mar 2009
    • 23569

    #2
    your not a patch on Teds poetry
    Chelmsford City the home of Radio

    Comment

    • bonheurjh
      Silver Seat
      • Jul 2012
      • 3764

      #3
      Originally posted by Gtleighsr3
      your not a patch on Teds poetry
      Well I have the right to blame

      Comment

      • markarnold
        Apprentice
        • Jan 2010
        • 105

        #4
        Originally posted by bonheurjh
        Well I have the right to blame
        I thought Park was utter cr ap and cant believe he stayed on for 90 mins

        Comment

        • QPRJACK123
          Bronze Seat
          • Oct 2009
          • 470

          #5
          Park was better today though

          Comment

          • bonheurjh
            Silver Seat
            • Jul 2012
            • 3764

            #6
            Originally posted by markarnold
            I thought Park was utter cr ap and cant believe he stayed on for 90 mins
            maybe he has some problems with his first ever girlfriend in London

            Comment

            • QPRDave
              The number 10
              • Mar 2009
              • 32065

              #7
              Thought Park played well, lead the team with effort we worked hard without the ball good display

              Comment

              • stainrodisalegend
                Platinum Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 13624

                #8
                thought he was much better than he has been - suits him being on the right. That said he was not nearly as effective as granero or diakite.

                Comment

                • bonheurjh
                  Silver Seat
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 3764

                  #9
                  Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
                  thought he was much better than he has been - suits him being on the right. That said he was not nearly as effective as granero or diakite.
                  I wonder why our players were all slipping like a slice of cake on a mirror

                  Comment

                  • Gtleighsr3
                    CCG
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 23569

                    #10
                    i dont know what we all expected when we signed Park.hes never been prolific,a deff grafter,bit of a super sub .Hes getting on a bit now and we play him all the time,perhaps a sub role to see if he can make a better impact.He did ok by the way for me today also
                    Chelmsford City the home of Radio

                    Comment

                    • stainrodisalegend
                      Platinum Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 13624

                      #11
                      Originally posted by bonheurjh
                      I wonder why our players were all slipping like a slice of cake on a mirror
                      v wet - but maybe cd have played with longer studs?

                      Comment

                      • bonheurjh
                        Silver Seat
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 3764

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Gtleighsr3
                        i dont know what we all expected when we signed Park.hes never been prolific,a deff grafter,bit of a super sub .Hes getting on a bit now and we play him all the time,perhaps a sub role to see if he can make a better impact.He did ok by the way for me today also
                        I always expect some hero works from him, so the disappointment is even greater

                        Comment

                        • Captain Planet
                          Bronze Seat
                          • May 2009
                          • 917

                          #13
                          I thought it was his best game. He put himself about well and Baines, one of the best attacking fullbacks in the league, was largely uninvolved. A lot of what Park did well will probably go unnoticed, but there's no coincidence that Everton had not much luck down the left today. I thought he put in some decent challenges too.

                          Comment

                          • QPRDave
                            The number 10
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 32065

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Gtleighsr3;953183[B
                            ]i dont know what we all expected when we signed Park.hes never been prolific,a deff grafter,bit of a super sub[/B] .Hes getting on a bit now and we play him all the time,perhaps a sub role to see if he can make a better impact.He did ok by the way for me today also
                            Agree with that

                            Comment

                            • vblockranger
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 15218

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Gtleighsr3
                              i dont know what we all expected when we signed Park.hes never been prolific,a deff grafter,bit of a super sub .Hes getting on a bit now and we play him all the time,perhaps a sub role to see if he can make a better impact.He did ok by the way for me today also
                              agree with this..just not effective enough to play every game. Man Utd got rid at the right time again.

                              Comment

                              Working...