Quite funny those that are having a go at Pete....

[Sam-QPR]

You really are a clueless p rick!!!

just answer don't go to insults.

any argument you have goe's out the window when you start that rubbish

you did the same to benny earlier

exactly but magilton will be under alot of pressure from the fans and the board to play attacking football. magilton will not be in control of transfers.

we conceded two sloppy goals. he tried to sort this out. with a striker things would be different

but he dropped a striker who actually scored last week....pellicori scored in the cup game...was dropped...you know that strikers are confidnce players.....gorkks dropped.....because magilton has no faith because of the plymouth goal...or because he has to play hall?

[Sam-QPR]

so the solutions are either go back to the way we played last season or buy a couple of good strikers.

Magilton is known for tinkering...done it at ipswich and was hated for it.

exactly but magilton will be under alot of pressure from the fans and the board to play attacking football. magilton will not be in control of transfers.

we conceded two sloppy goals. he tried to sort this out. with a striker things would be different

[vblockranger]

take it easy m8

You really are a clueless p rick!!!

a bit over top mate...no need.

[WeAreQPR12]

You really are a clueless p rick!!!

[Sam-QPR]

Sam ok I will use the same old sentence once again. I have played central defence at a decent level and you need to stop tinkering with a side. I played 38 games with the same centre back and we built a great understanding and really complemented each other. Vidic and Ferdinand are a prime example of this. Gorkks and connelly should be developing there partnership and for some reason that is not happening. Same goes with centre forwards. Have tarrabt and Agyemang even played together before. To have success we need to know our best players and that doesn't seem to be the case. Leaving connelly out is very odd. If he was injured why was he on the bench on the last 2 league games?

we have been told connelly is not 100%. he should not be risked.

so Mr.expert when you played at the back and someone hit a cracking strike did it mean you and the other center back was **** or was it the managers fault. no it didn't and no it wasn't . did you ever concede? because i believe that you must have done at some point. was this the managers fault?

if a striker has a bad few games he is dropped. the same goes with the defense.

you should also know that most of the chemistry in the team comes directly from the training ground. this is where you perfect your partnership. whether it be defense, midfield or up front

i have to ask what level in the system did you play at?

last season i think you will find the defense was "so good" because of our style of football rather than any of them being top class. the midfield dropped deeper. this season this is not the case. we are much more attacking. the only bit missing is a striker.

gorkss was part of the defense that conceded two soft goals. it is th managers job to sort this is what he did. remember maynards goal was a good goal not a 2 yard tap in.

we all know the problem is up front not at the back and certainly not with the manager.

but we cannot afford to tinker with the defence as there is too much pressure to keep a clean sheet as the strikers don't score......so the solutions are either go back to the way we played last season or buy a couple of good strikers.

Magilton is known for tinkering...done it at ipswich and was hated for it.

[WeAreQPR12]

I must of missed this attacking football.
In the 1st 15 mins we looked dangerous against blackpool, with attacking football then we ran out of ideas. Without a fit buzz and a fit vine we are very ordinary, so I don't think we have the players to play wonderful attacking play without the 2 names mentioned.

[Sam-QPR]

so bar delaney we have played the defence that was so good last season?

last season i think you will find the defense was "so good" because of our style of football rather than any of them being top class. the midfield dropped deeper. this season this is not the case. we are much more attacking. the only bit missing is a striker.

gorkss was part of the defense that conceded two soft goals. it is th managers job to sort this is what he did. remember maynards goal was a good goal not a 2 yard tap in.

we all know the problem is up front not at the back and certainly not with the manager.

[WeAreQPR12]

Sam ok I will use the same old sentence once again. I have played central defence at a decent level and you need to stop tinkering with a side. I played 38 games with the same centre back and we built a great understanding and really complemented each other. Vidic and Ferdinand are a prime example of this. Gorkks and connelly should be developing there partnership and for some reason that is not happening. Same goes with centre forwards. Have tarrabt and Agyemang even played together before. To have success we need to know our best players and that doesn't seem to be the case. Leaving connelly out is very odd. If he was injured why was he on the bench on the last 2 league games?

we have conceded three in the league

2 while gorkss was playing

gorkss was playing against two of the favourites to be relegated. when we played a team expected to finish mid table and upwards we still only conceded one. i simply don't get the argument.

we conceded an easy goal against blackpool and an even easier one at plymouth. maybe jim wanted to stop this and shake the defense up. i can totally understand this.

so bar delaney we have played the defence that was so good last season?

[Sam-QPR]

how many clean sheets we got so far?

we have conceded three in the league

2 while gorkss was playing

gorkss was playing against two of the favourites to be relegated. when we played a team expected to finish mid table and upwards we still only conceded one. i simply don't get the argument.

we conceded an easy goal against blackpool and an even easier one at plymouth. maybe jim wanted to stop this and shake the defense up. i can totally understand this.

anyway chaps nite nites for me gotta do the fatherly taxi run at 4.30 am Gatwick Grrrrr

tomorrow morning should be interesting

wonder how many more players pete will quote as not making a difference...night mate

Yes its true I dont get much time to come on here because of work, so I dont keep up with all the posts but it sounds like PK, Quaz and WeAreQPR12 are saying that Pete is a simply a mouthpiece for the club?

That sounds almost conspiratorial ;)

if the cap fits wear it i say...in petes case that is