Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hogan

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • theblackmafia.
    Silver Seat
    • Sep 2009
    • 3996

    #31
    Hogans a quality little player and I'm glad he's in the 25...well done Hogan....and I'd have Hogan on the wing over bleedin Mackie any day of the week.

    Comment

    • HammersmithR
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 5537

      #32
      Not good enough. Couldn't get in our side when we were in the Championship and now can't even make our match day squad. The only reason he was given a new contract was because Rangers didn't want to lose him on a Bosman and get nothing for him. He has shown he is happy to pick up his wages rather than go to a Championship club and prove himself. No surprise that Charlton or Bristol City didn't want to buy him when he was on loan there. Waste of a space in the 25 man squad.
      First game: Arsenal vs Queen's Park Rangers at Highbury, Saturday 17th November 1984.

      Comment

      • qpr4life
        Gold Seat
        • Apr 2009
        • 5044

        #33
        Originally posted by HammersmithR
        Not good enough. Couldn't get in our side when we were in the Championship and now can't even make our match day squad. The only reason he was given a new contract was because Rangers didn't want to lose him on a Bosman and get nothing for him. He has shown he is happy to pick up his wages rather than go to a Championship club and prove himself. No surprise that Charlton or Bristol City didn't want to buy him when he was on loan there. Waste of a space in the 25 man squad.
        The guy played 28 games for us in our championship winning season - Not a bad return for a guy who COULDNT GET IN OUR SQUAD...

        Oh did you forget the goal he scored at Donny - gave us a very important 3 points!!

        Unreal...

        Comment

        • Stanley
          Guest
          • Mar 2009
          • 23693

          #34
          Originally posted by qpr4life
          The guy played 28 games for us in our championship winning season - Not a bad return for a guy who COULDNT GET IN OUR SQUAD...

          Oh did you forget the goal he scored at Donny - gave us a very important 3 points!!

          Unreal...
          Scored a good one at Bramall Lane too I remember.

          Comment

          • qpr4life
            Gold Seat
            • Apr 2009
            • 5044

            #35
            Originally posted by Stanley76
            Scored a good one at Bramall Lane too I remember.
            Apparently he couldn't even get in our team...

            They guy has ability and needs time and games!! As always certain players get no chance at QPR....

            Jheeez we all hated Helguson at one point

            Comment

            • Stanley
              Guest
              • Mar 2009
              • 23693

              #36
              Originally posted by qpr4life
              Jheeez we all hated Helguson at one point
              And dont forget Furlong

              Comment

              • qpr4life
                Gold Seat
                • Apr 2009
                • 5044

                #37
                Originally posted by Stanley76
                And dont forget Furlong
                Cor Furlong was crap... I mean it wasnt like he did anything good for us....

                Comment

                • Greg1882
                  Silver Seat
                  • May 2012
                  • 4704

                  #38
                  I think hogan deserves a crack , works hard and does chip in with the of goal too . Seems a nice lad and there is obviously something there or sparky wouldn't have had him in . Won't get a lot of game time but I personally am really chuffed for him . Good on ya hogan

                  Comment

                  • Stanley
                    Guest
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 23693

                    #39
                    Originally posted by paulmason
                    You need to understand what IMO means, it means the reasons listed are why I dont think he will never be a regular PL player, not why you think he should be.
                    Originally posted by paulmason
                    If you stooped looking for things that are not there and just accept there are better players at QPR FC than Hogan, your life would be happier.
                    No need for these type of remarks Paul, it does yourself no favours at all. Please just accept and respect the fact that other people might have a different opinion to you. Its typicaly these type of posts that causes you problems with your fellow posters and mods on this forum.

                    Comment

                    • paulmason
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 7443

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Stanley76
                      No need for these type of remarks Paul, it does yourself no favours at all. Please just accept and respect the fact that other people might have a different opinion to you. Its typicaly these type of posts that causes you problems with your fellow posters and mods on this forum.
                      You really have a problem Stanley and I am staggered at your post.

                      Have a look at the context of those responses.

                      One was in response to someone who was telling me I was wrong with what I said, the other was in response to the same person who was telling me he thought I just didn't like Hogan, which is not true.

                      You then have the gaul to post the tripe you have, when in fact you should have advised the said poster he should just accept and respect the fact that other people might have a different opinion to him.

                      So, I would ask you to go back, read the context of my responses and then post an apology.

                      Also, your post is the typical type of post from Mods who just want to single out and antagonise certain posters.
                      Last edited by paulmason; 06-09-2012, 10:25 AM.

                      Comment

                      • Stanley
                        Guest
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 23693

                        #41
                        Originally posted by paulmason
                        Also, your post is the typical type of post from Mods who just want to single out and antagonise certain posters
                        As I say, theyre just two small examples of a whole litany of them. Plenty of posters single you out as well Paul (certainly not just mods). Its been going on for years here. Do you really have no clue at all as to the reason for that?

                        Comment

                        • SammyKojoe
                          Silver Seat
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 1451

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Stanley76
                          No need for these type of remarks Paul, it does yourself no favours at all. Please just accept and respect the fact that other people might have a different opinion to you. Its typicaly these type of posts that causes you problems with your fellow posters and mods on this forum.
                          No need for this type of post either. You seem to be looking for trouble and a reaction?

                          The guy said to Mason he is talking "Utter rubbish just to try and accentuate your point " Basically saying his opinion is wrong. Does that sound to you like the poster is respecting and accepting Mason has a different opinion to him?

                          All Mason did was reply explaining what he meant. Yet you single Mason out and not the orginal offender? Very bizzare.

                          Comment

                          • Stanley
                            Guest
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 23693

                            #43
                            Originally posted by SammyKojoe
                            Yet you single Mason out and not the orginal offender? Very bizzare.
                            You want REAL context Sammy?

                            How long have you been reading this site for?

                            Best to leave it at that I think.

                            Comment

                            Working...