Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

England axe Rio Ferdinand over fitness doubts... but John Terry set for Euro 2012 cal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MYU
    Administrator
    • Mar 2009
    • 43466

    #1

    England axe Rio Ferdinand over fitness doubts... but John Terry set for Euro 2012 cal

    New England boss Roy Hodgson axes Rio Ferdinand over fitness doubts... but John Terry set for Euro 2012 call

    More...
  • 80sCasual
    CCG
    • Dec 2009
    • 9231

    #2
    I do hope they're having a laugh re JT.
    Queens Park Rangers
    NPower Champions 2010/2011

    PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)

    Comment

    • QPRDave
      The number 10
      • Mar 2009
      • 32080

      #3
      If Roy Hodgson takes terry to the finals then i hope the f*cker gets slated all over the press, and is booted out.How the hell can a player with a court case pending be allowed to represent England?

      Comment

      • stainrodisalegend
        Platinum Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 13624

        #4
        Unless Terry is cleared of the charges prior to his taking part in the tournament I will really struggle to get behind England in this.

        Comment

        • QPRDave
          The number 10
          • Mar 2009
          • 32080

          #5
          Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
          Unless Terry is cleared of the charges prior to his taking part in the tournament I will really struggle to get behind England in this.
          Agree Stainrod, it's Terry's legal team that have pushed the case back, and i wouldn't be surprised if the fa backed that tactic, so they could then select him for the euros.

          Comment

          • The Leveller
            Bronze Seat
            • Apr 2011
            • 462

            #6
            Despite everything I despise about Terry, his past and current antics, English law dictates innocent until proven guilty. One of the great concepts that puts the G in GB.

            The issue is whether on current form should he go and the answer is no and I suspect that if others were fit or not injury prone he would not be getting on the plane.
            Last edited by The Leveller; 16-05-2012, 09:10 AM. Reason: typo
            Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomen

            Comment

            • bushcelt1
              CCG
              • Sep 2009
              • 11070

              #7
              Originally posted by qprdave
              agree stainrod, it's terry's legal team that have pushed the case back, and i wouldn't be surprised if the fa backed that tactic, so they could then select him for the euros.
              his mum fancied a bit of shopping!!!
              PRIDE OF LONDON.

              Comment

              • stainrodisalegend
                Platinum Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 13624

                #8
                Originally posted by The Leveller
                Despite everything I despise about Terry, his past and current antics, English law dictates innocent until proven guilty. One of the great concepts that puts the G in GB.

                The issue is whether on current form should he go and the answer is no and I suspect that if others were fit or not injury prone he would not be getting on the plane.
                Take your point Leveller which is why I want a trial prior to the tournament. If he is found innocent then, although I will continue to loathe the guy for other reasons, I will back England even with him in the team. But the alleged offence must have been six months ago now, it is hardly as if it is some complicated fraud trial: it should be possible to arrive at a verdict pretty swiftly. And if he is found guilty, even if he appeals, I don't think he should be anywhere near the England set up.

                Comment

                • QPRDave
                  The number 10
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 32080

                  #9
                  Originally posted by bushcelt1
                  his mum fancied a bit of shopping!!!

                  Comment

                  • Del
                    Gold Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 8393

                    #10
                    If it was a footballing decision it wouldn't make any difference, but the fact it's clearly because of the court case and what happened that only one will be selected. In that scenario, for Rio to miss out for Terry's actions, aleged or otherwise, is a disgrace.

                    As said above his legal team managed to push it back so he didn't miss games and the euros..... How was this allowed to happen anyway? It's a fu$%ing legal hearing so why wasn't he ordered to attend when it suited them, not when it suited him?!! I'm sure if i was called into something like this i couldn't get it delayed 6 months until it suited me because of my work commitments..... It should be the same for everyone regardless of profile.

                    You also have to aask why were they so determined to push it back.... maybe it's becasue they know the evidence is damning and he'll be found guilty. Blimey we've all seen the footage, which in itself is pretty definitive.

                    So to England... If this decision is made, a great player like Rio hass his international career ended prematurely becasue of Terry, and so Terry can play. This is fundamentally wrong.

                    It looks bad now, but just imagine how much worse the decision will look if Terry is found guilty!

                    Also, all this BS about he can't play games in quick succession is the reason, rubbish! That may prevent him being a starter, but he would be the best back up option if that was the logic, in case one of the starters was to get injured. he may not be as good as he was, but he's still better than most England CB's.

                    Comment

                    • QPRDave
                      The number 10
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 32080

                      #11
                      Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
                      Take your point Leveller which is why I want a trial prior to the tournament. If he is found innocent then, although I will continue to loathe the guy for other reasons, I will back England even with him in the team. But the alleged offence must have been six months ago now, it is hardly as if it is some complicated fraud trial: it should be possible to arrive at a verdict pretty swiftly. And if he is found guilty, even if he appeals, I don't think he should be anywhere near the England set up.
                      spot on

                      Comment

                      • bushcelt1
                        CCG
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 11070

                        #12
                        Originally posted by QPRDave

                        PRIDE OF LONDON.

                        Comment

                        • QPRDave
                          The number 10
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 32080

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Del
                          If it was a footballing decision it wouldn't make any difference, but the fact it's clearly because of the court case and what happened that only one will be selected. In that scenario, for Rio to miss out for Terry's actions, aleged or otherwise, is a disgrace.

                          As said above his legal team managed to push it back so he didn't miss games and the euros..... How was this allowed to happen anyway? It's a fu$%ing legal hearing so why wasn't he ordered to attend when it suited them, not when it suited him?!! I'm sure if i was called into something like this i couldn't get it delayed 6 months until it suited me because of my work commitments..... It should be the same for everyone regardless of profile.

                          You also have to aask why were they so determined to push it back.... maybe it's becasue they know the evidence is damning and he'll be found guilty. Blimey we've all seen the footage, which in itself is pretty definitive.

                          So to England... If this decision is made, a great player like Rio hass his international career ended prematurely becasue of Terry, and so Terry can play. This is fundamentally wrong.

                          It looks bad now, but just imagine how much worse the decision will look if Terry is found guilty!

                          Also, all this BS about he can't play games in quick succession is the reason, rubbish! That may prevent him being a starter, but he would be the best back up option if that was the logic, in case one of the starters was to get injured. he may not be as good as he was, but he's still better than most England CB's.
                          agree del, and it feels to me like the victim or in this case the victim's family is paying the price for family loyalty.

                          Comment

                          • The Leveller
                            Bronze Seat
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 462

                            #14
                            Well to add a spice and twist to this, it is what you get when you engage one of the UK's top criminal lawyers. By the way indirectly they may have asked but used the employers request. It was a letter given to Justice Riddle from the CEO of Chelsea that asked for a deferment, not just of the PL season but international commitments as well. The former i could make a case for but international, who and why that was asked for is strange.

                            Unforgettably this is not the first time that there is a link between QPR and Terry's defence team, they were involved in the Kiyan Prince murder case.
                            Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomen

                            Comment

                            • Olly
                              Gold Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 6000

                              #15
                              General rule of thumb is, the longer a case takes to get to trial because of stalling, the more the guilt. And the FA know it. He's guilty.

                              Comment

                              Working...