Cisse after ban

[Yousef]

Cisse is need for Spurs, Chelsea and Man City

[Stanley]

Revert to 4-4-2 with Cisse partnering BZ or HH.

We have the ability and confidence to adapt IMO and Cisse's goal threat will make it impossible to leave him out of the starting 11, especially as he will be even more determined. He had forged a very promising partnership with Zamora too.

[sirduncs]

Cisse is need for Spurs, Chelsea and Man City

cisse and zammo upfront

[QPRDave]

Revert to 4-4-2 with Cisse partnering BZ or HH.

We have the ability and confidence to adapt IMO and Cisse's goal threat will make it impossible to leave him out of the starting 11, especially as he will be even more determined. He had forged a very promising partnership with Zamora too.

Not too sure myself Stanley, we have looked solid defensively, these last few games, because imo the 3 centre mids Buzz/Dezza, Diakite, Barton, and would be
a little worried to take away that protection by going 4-4-2. Even down to 10 at Man U and playing a rearguard action they still struggled to get through us.

[taarabt7]

Don't need to try and fix what is not broken. Carry on as the way we are.The chances are that he'll get sent off again. Bring him on in the second-half. He's energy and speed will have a great impact

[Shania]

Don't need to try and fix what is not broken. Carry on as the way we are.The chances are that he'll get sent off again. Bring him on in the second-half. He's energy and speed will have a great impact

That´s my advice(very important,lol.) as well.

By the way,this is the match of the century.

[80sCasual]

Cisse and Zamora with Mackie as an impact sub, Cisse tires early so Mackie is a perfect replacement.

[MattyRangers]

I think it all depends on the WBA game. If we win then dont change it. If we dont then, IMO, shove Cisse back in the line and drop whoever deserves it based upon the WBA game.

If it aint broken, dont fix it.

[Artful]

Can see him playing same formation for rest of season. Lots of conjecture as to wether its 4-5-1 or 4-3-3 (as sky gave line up last night) or 4-4-1-1

[Geng]

How would it be a 4-4-1-1? Who is the 1 just behind the striker? The two wide players - Mackie and Taarabt - were clearly more advanced than any of the midfield three.

I don't even think 4231 describes it correctly, as the 3 CMs rotated so much. 433 I reckon, obviously switching back to a 451 without the ball.

[nige101uk]

...Lots of conjecture as to wether its 4-5-1 or 4-3-3 (as sky gave line up last night) or 4-4-1-1

...I don't even think 4231 describes it correctly, as the 3 CMs rotated so much. 433 I reckon, obviously switching back to a 451 without the ball.

And this is why we won

[frapps]

He has to play he's quality just needs to behave himself.