they will dock us 100 points for asking
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Appeal
Collapse
X
-
Exactly. I can't see why this would be so unlikely. It's certainly not unprecedented. The FA have never denied that ref's never get some decisions wrong due to human error.Originally posted by oldskoolturk View PostBy overturning it the FA would effectively be admitting it should never have been a pen
Comment
-
But he touched,... and that's all it was, but he touched him with his hand on the blindside from the ref, the ref ain't allowed to give a foul by guess work which if that's what he gave the pen for it was.Originally posted by Nik29 View PostThe point is that there is contact between the players. Derry touched Young so they won't overturn it.
Imo he gave that pen because he thought it was a trip
Comment
-
It's a contact sport. Just because he touched him doesn't automatically make it a foul. Player contact happens all over the pitch. That doesn't make it a foul everytime there's contact. And anyway by the letter of the law it's a yellow for Young for simulation. And by the letter of the law it was offside before the Young dive.Originally posted by Nik29 View PostThe point is that there is contact between the players. Derry touched Young so they won't overturn it.
Comment
-
Yeah I agree.. it's s.hit how the game is changing into a non-contact sport, but unfortunately that's the way I believe the FA will see the incident - though I'd love to be proved wrong.Originally posted by Stanley76 View PostIt's a contact sport. Just because he touched him doesn't automatically make it a foul. Player contact happens all over the pitch. That doesn't make it a foul everytime there's contact. And anyway by the letter of the law it's a yellow for Young for simulation. And by the letter of the law it was offside before the Young dive.
Comment
-
I agree that it should not have been a penalty and the ball should not have been in play at the time of the penalty. However, because there was no flag the ball was still active and so when he did award the penalty for a foul it had to be a red card.Originally posted by W12_Ranger View PostBut it wasn't a penalty there is no letter of the law to apply
Letter of the law was the ball should have not been even in play. If we apply the true letter of the law for the penalty then Young should have been booked for diving.
I would love it for the FA to overturn the red card and award ashley young a yellow but I just can't see it happening
Comment
-
Have to agree with the "blatant corruption".Originally posted by QPRDave View PostIf that doesn't get overturned it's got to be blatant corruption,if the lino had flagged correctly the "foul" wouldn't have happened, but of course even Stevie Wonder can see that's a dive as well
Young should have got a card for diving.
Comment
-
What frightens me mate is it all just seems to get swept away, i think we need to make a huge fuss about this Tony on twitter the lot, i just can't see how an appeal would not be successful, how they can make excuses for that much incompetance, which is the 2nd major decision going against us in what...3 weeks?Originally posted by MYU View PostHave to agree with the "blatant corruption".
Young should have got a card for diving.
Comment
-
Exactly... think it's time the world of football stand together and make this change happen.Originally posted by QPRDave View PostWhat frightens me mate is it all just seems to get swept away, i think we need to make a huge fuss about this Tony on twitter the lot, i just can't see how an appeal would not be successful, how they can make excuses for that much incompetance, which is the 2nd major decision going against us in what...3 weeks?
The only bad thing to come out of this is that the top 4 lose out!
I think ref's should be fined if they get it wrong.
Comment
Comment