If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It's not that simple. It's a mixture of a lot of things.
But tbh the buck stops at the manager, as TF funded his spending spree. Some of our transfer dealings have not been ideal and the team lacks organisation and motivation it seems.
Briatore and ecclestone. If Warnock had the money when he needed it, and not the last few days of the transfer window then we'd have players like Graham, Mackail Smith, Morison and many more who are not overpaid idiots.
"When you went to the corner and saw our fans celebrating the way they were you just wanted to be part of it" - Shaun Derry after we beat the scum 1-0
because of where we was before xmas.. im going to say hughes.. and the players.. largely the players because even with our 'depleted' team.. we managed to get to as high as 9th. with lets face it a worse team than we have now. so im going to say hughes / players.
Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Mark Hughes for me, reason, simply because he has had enough time to build this squad and install a winning formula. He spent fortunes around £20m, had 4 months to prepare and still couldn't deliver.
IMHO - without him we would have been far better off and could have had a captain who leads the team. I think he is a bad apple. Every club he leaves improves pretty fast.
My vote would definately have been Barton. Followed by Hughes tbh - he had the time, the money, the window, the bonding camp and has been a failure. Don't let 13 minutes of Liverpool falling to bits fool you.
Comment