Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

are we the laziest team in the prem?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • maidstone_hoop
    Gold Seat
    • May 2009
    • 6718

    #16
    We dont press the ball enough for a prem team! we stand clear and there were times we had 3 players surrounding one of their players and their player still came out with the ball or found a pass. Our movement is shocking, even from throw in there was no energy or deire to make runs bring a defender out of position so someone else could find space. I lost count how many times when one of our players would throw their hands in the air when they had the ball as no one made runs or space to be passed to.
    Our abillity to retain possession is very poor at this level you have to be able to play the ball on the floor for long periods of times. Also some of our first touches for prem players is also well of the pace.
    There is alot of improvement to be made. But I look at the team hughes could put out today and what can we expect. We are with out Traore, tarbs, faurlin and barton and those 4 are massive loses.

    Comment

    • Westbyfleetr
      Bronze Seat
      • Jun 2011
      • 525

      #17
      Thought quite the opposite. Reducing NUFC to one shot on target at SJP does NOT come from being lazy. We worked hard with no end product. A striker with pace and presence would've stretched them at the back but afraid HH (despite his earlier goals spell) and JB are Championship class.

      Comment

      • DeepcutHoop
        Gold Seat
        • Dec 2009
        • 6965

        #18
        Originally posted by BennyBoyRs
        I brought we worked very hard. Bothroyd was the only lazy one there today.
        Nonsense. He was crap in front of goal, but not lazy.

        Comment

        • ClemQPR
          Apprentice
          • Jun 2011
          • 141

          #19
          Don't think that we were lazy, just slow and not enough quality.

          We could have played all day and not scored.

          Comment

          • gravesendhoop
            Bronze Seat
            • Aug 2009
            • 977

            #20
            they didn't break in numbers. There were countless occasions when we broke with the ball and four or five players just stood rooted Watching one man struggle, usually mackie, to beat the five players surrounding him. Not good enough. Hughes won't save this year we should've hired dynamo as manager. Keeping us up would be his most astonishing trick yet!

            Comment

            • hemelhoop
              Silver Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 1284

              #21
              To many one pace players, and not enough quality to cause other teams to many problems.

              Comment

              • neetoneeto
                Apprentice
                • Jan 2012
                • 61

                #22
                We were ponderous around the pitch, uncommitted for the loose ball, lacklustre in attack, unmotivated, unoriginal, poor; in fact a very typical display

                Comment

                Working...