smudge on twitter...

[indianalondon]

Despite being a journalist, I find that Smudge doesn't sensationalise without any basis to his point.

Scott, you may have good contacts, but that doesn't mean you can state as dfact that you know more than him about all things QPR. For example his source during the Faurlin 'trial' was at the QC's chambers. I would say that as the chief football writer for the Sunday Mirror, he is likely to have a hugely bigger contact book than you are! Just saying...

His source was a junior at Blackstone Chambers. Er, methinks you dont know much about what 2 QCs were actually representing us in the hearing...

[EYR]

Enlighten us then as to whats happening with these Ruskies

[2touch]

His source was a junior at Blackstone Chambers. Er, methinks you dont know much about what 2 QCs were actually representing us in the hearing...

Life is not a competition to see who is the most ITK mate! It would be no disgrace for a hack of his experience to have a wider range of quality sources than you. I tend to believe what he is hearing on this one and that a takeover is being discussed as it makes no sense at all for Tango + Cash to relegate us by weakening the team. Makes no sense for them financially which is obviously what they are about, so I think stories of there being nothing discussed are more likely to be wrong.

[2touch]

His source was a junior at Blackstone Chambers. Er, methinks you dont know much about what 2 QCs were actually representing us in the hearing...

I would also add that his 'junior' source led to him giving much more detail of the case than you revealed if I am not mistaken?

[indianalondon]

I would also add that his 'junior' source led to him giving much more detail of the case than you revealed if I am not mistaken?

There's certain things that you do not say.

Feel free to read my post about the Faurlin saga that I posted way back in March (based on what I was hearing re the specifics of what we had done)

http://qprr.co.uk/2011/03/10/qpr-and-alejandro-faurlin/

[2touch]

There's certain things that you do not say.

Feel free to read my post about the Faurlin saga that I posted way back in March (based on what I was hearing re the specifics of what we had done)

http://qprr.co.uk/2011/03/10/qpr-and-alejandro-faurlin/

When you say 'certain things you do not say' what is the point in telling everyone how much you know, but then saying that you can't tell anyone. Better to say nothing at all than to claim to have known everything all along once someone else breaks the story. Not saying I don't believe you, but it can be hard to gain credibility by doing this.

[SullivanQPR]

Oops, somebody's touched a nerve.

[Filiranger]

more chance of 'seymour butt' closing the deal!!

:drunk:

[brightonr]

Oops, somebody's touched a nerve.

Fortunately, I know nothing so am not going to say anything.