Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Atletico Madrid want Taarabt for £11million
Collapse
X
-
-
I know. Thats because most clubs realise that keeping an unhappy player is counter-productive both financially and for team morale. So they sell him, but NOT because they have to under the terms of contract, unless there's a get-out clause.
In order for clubs to wrestle back some of the power from the players, more clubs would have to take this type of a sacrificed stand against them for the long-term health of the sport. At first only the ones with the financial clout could afford to do it of course.Comment
-
Spot on. Given his bloodpressure is not damaged for life due to last years strops from Adel, I really hope Warnock will get the chance to make him Even a better player this year.
As I see it; Adel needs to learn more about disipline before he can make for a club in La Liga or Serie A.(Wishful thinking maybe)QPR
Best team in the world
Sort ofComment
-
He threw his toys out the pram when he could not take a penalty, free kick, someone did not pass to him or he was subbed, so god knows what he would be like/do if we held him to his contract when he wanted to play for another team. If the rumors are true about bids being made, I wonder if he will be at Harlington on Thursday.Luke, I know that of course. It was just an attempt to (remind and) re-introduce the concept that players still do have contracts.
Also I dont think its quite accurate to say that "contracts mean nothing". Theoretically speaking, if a club could afford it and had the will to carry it through, could just not sell any contracted player and, if necessary, let him rot in the reserves.
A little idealistic and unrealistic I know, but a point worth remembering nonetheless.Last edited by paulmason; 04-07-2011, 10:41 AM.Comment

Comment