Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Chamakh

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rebel R's
    King of Pessimism
    • Mar 2009
    • 12266

    #16
    Another loan signing possibility but would be a good one

    Comment

    • hermitage10
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 2973

      #17
      His wages will be too high for us. Why would he want to join us ahead of staying at arsenal and playing champions league football??
      CHAMPIONS
      Ainsworth is a Legend http://twitter.com/#!/ChrisHermitage Has scored at Loftus Road

      Comment

      • Ellerslie
        Silver Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 1022

        #18
        Bowyer and Bullard are the sort of player we will sign. Chamakh is young, talented and expensive. We won't sign him I'm afraid.

        Comment

        • paulmason
          Banned
          • Mar 2009
          • 7443

          #19
          Originally posted by UB6-RANGER
          More realistic Taarabt joined him at Arsenal than the other way round.
          Where would he fit into the system Arsenal play, as they play a similar one to barca, where it is quick passing in triangles and if you loose the ball, they try to get it back in 6 seconds.

          Comment

          • SM3 Ranger
            Bronze Seat
            • Apr 2011
            • 324

            #20
            What if and it is a big what if
            with the talk of of the Kingfisher interest and may be the Mittals now having a taste for success they decide to not only open the wallet but decide to heavily invest?
            We could be in for a pleasant surprise and all of a sudden that 2500/1 would certainly shorten(lay it off!)
            All supposition but hey this is QPR and we all know that any thing is possible

            Comment

            Working...