F.A.

[scarface]

So if we believe what smudge1962 is telling us and we've no reason not to as he's more or less been spot on so far, the fa's case is a mess and they've little eveidence against us and their delaying on purpose by not keeping to the timetable thus giving themselves more time to dig dirt on us.
My gut feeling is they want to find us guilty to save face and probably will do, but my point is just think if it was us that wasn't keeping to the timetable they'd be on us likes ton of bricks we wouldn't get extra time they've had since September to sort this mess out and now they are going to ruin the day for the whole club supporters and players on Saturday.

[silvercue]

F.A. stands for something completely different now. Ending in "holes".

[Ellerslie]

Patrick Barclay in The Times says we could well still be doomed.

Personally I don't buy everything that Smudge is telling us as it is so obviously endorsed by the club.

If the evidence against us is so poor then the Independant QC would have wrapped this up in our favour by now.

[Mellowhoop]

F.A. stands for something completely different now. Ending in "holes".

Ant holes ?

[Loneranger80]

have you a link mate?

[Ellerslie]

Incidentally. It won't be the FA that finds us guilty, it will be the independent panel.

[Ellerslie]

have you a link mate?

You can't link to The Times website as it's subscription only.

[Loneranger80]

ok mate cheers....

[stainrod10]

Incidentally. It won't be the FA that finds us guilty, it will be the independent panel.

oh will they - wouldn't bother going tomorrow then.

Maybe we won't be found guilty though - there's a thought!