In Line For Another Defender

[Bernie's Barnet]

What about good old Borrowdale????

Like I said....

[hhrangers]

if we get promoted, we will have a whole new team to keep us up there and they have to blend together. the board/warnock should realise this and bring in a couple of additions now that would get us up and be good enough next year. rather than having to rely on loans or "back up" players.

[Goddard]

So "the word from the powers that be" is because we score goals, it's not a problem that needs addressing.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but despite the schoolboy f*ck ups today, we do also have one of the best defensive records... but that is a position that needs strengthening?

Bottom Line: Defenders are cheaper, I suppose.

I'm not a serial web-slagger of our team, and I don't happen to think our strikers are "sh*t"... but they are all very much alike. And far from prolific.

[rangersroar]

We are one of the highest scorers in this division.

Taarabt is regarded as a striker, so with Hulse/Helguson/Smith?Mackie they feel we have enough

That just shows how little they know !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hulse--1 goal
Helguson--6 goals but 4 are penalties
Mackie--1 goal since we played Leicester

This is a laughable situation.

We have only won 5 of our last 15 games, hardly promotion form. We have been lucky that other teams have been losing games.

[stan_bowles]

We have been lucky that other teams have been losing games.

Nail on head.

Otherwise we would be about 6th.

[Ric-Roc]

So "the word from the powers that be" is because we score goals, it's not a problem that needs addressing.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but despite the schoolboy f*ck ups today, we do also have one of the best defensive records... but that is a position that needs strengthening?

Bottom Line: Defenders are cheaper, I suppose.

I'm not a serial web-slagger of our team, and I don't happen to think our strikers are "sh*t"... but they are all very much alike. And far from prolific.

As always Goddard. On the button.

[bushkangaroo]

No decent striker, no automatic promotion. Play-offs at very best for us this season. If Tarbs get injured in Feb, we won't even achieve that.

[Bluehoop]

The problem is on the statistics of it all - our goal difference is the same as the cumulative total of the 4 teams below us. That must say something about our ability to score goals - sadly, as we all know too well, football matches are not won on statistics - if they were, we would have trashed Brizzle.

[Sprocket]

Nail on head.

Otherwise we would be about 6th.

I don't mean to be rude but that's horse s h i t e

http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/league-championship/2009-2010/table/2010-01-08

[qpr_yuley]

No decent striker, no automatic promotion. Play-offs at very best for us this season. If Tarbs get injured in Feb, we won't even achieve that.

Bit OTT.

But do agree, we are in desperate need of another striker.

[Stanley]

So "the word from the powers that be" is because we score goals, it's not a problem that needs addressing.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but despite the schoolboy f*ck ups today, we do also have one of the best defensive records... but that is a position that needs strengthening?

Bottom Line: Defenders are cheaper, I suppose.

I'm not a serial web-slagger of our team, and I don't happen to think our strikers are "sh*t"... but they are all very much alike. And far from prolific.

All points that, throughout this thread, Pete has continuously dismissed. Why? I havent a clue, when its blindingly obvious to everyone else, including Warnock no doubt.