Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Chopra to QPR

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Goddard
    Silver Seat
    • Dec 2009
    • 4529

    #61
    Originally posted by Morris
    Amazing.

    For more years than I can count people have been crying out for a goalscorer, and at this level there isn't many better than Chops, yet people still arn't happy??

    Maybe we should be bidding for the likes of David Villa and Torres?
    Maybe that's because, for all those years we weren't unbeaten in december, and 7 points clear at the top of the league if we beat Watford at home on friday.
    In fact, we were utter sh*t.


    "Chops" the overweight, sulking, lolling-tongued pr*ck, is a good striker, but Warnock has said that even though he is a good player, he doesn't want him at an OTT price, and he wouldn't fit into what we're doing right now.

    Everyone has opinions, fair enough.... and I can only speak for myself, but on that, I agree with NW. That's all.


    That's not to say we don't need strengthening up front, or another option.
    Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


    Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

    Comment

    • Morris
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 8965

      #62
      Originally posted by G.T.P
      we are too good for him now, and hes a proper anusole of a man. #### him off. the clever people dont want him.
      You --- clever???

      I've seen better spelling and grammar from a 5 year old.

      Comment

      • G.T.P

        #63
        i was talking about neil.
        and my gramer is bang on. i got o levell english ill have you no :drunk:

        Comment

        • Morris
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 8965

          #64
          Originally posted by G.T.P
          i was talking about neil.
          and my gramer is bang on. i got o levell english ill have you no :drunk:

          Well you obviously included yourself in it, seeing as you agree with NW.


          Oh, when was that, 1917?

          Comment

          Working...