Mackie to Everton

[WeAreQPR12]

Agree we should sell him for that money as long as that money is available to sign a striker and not put into ground improvements. To think Pete said we are NOT a selling club, quite amusing when that boy comes out with those type of comments. Keep it up Pete

[qprjames]

For 3 million .

Mackie wont go anywhere. All paper talk.

[silvercue]

3 million seems an awful lot for a Scotland defender.

Jan is usually not a great month for good deals though, so unless we replace, with better - we are better off with the player - even if the money is double his value.

[WeAreQPR12]

Why would we want to sell our best players? I think you will find we are owned by some very rich people and therefore do not need to sell.

If he goes It will be stupid, we should be keeping our best players not selling them.

Thats where you have been feed wrong info from Pete. We ARE a selling clubs WR etc so expect them to cash in. I just hope they give Neil the money to sign a striker.

[qprjames]

Agree we should sell him for that money as long as that money is available to sign a striker and not put into ground improvements. To think Pete said we are NOT a selling club, quite amusing when that boy comes out with those type of comments. Keep it up Pete

WHY?

We can just buy a striker as it is, we dont need to sell Mackie. And we aren't a selling club, we are trying to get to the premiership and if we want to do that then you don't sell your best players.

[Rieger]

Why would we want to sell our best players? I think you will find we are owned by some very rich people and therefore do not need to sell.

If he goes It will be stupid, we should be keeping our best players not selling them.

because for 3 million we can get better. Next.

[Jeffro]

MAckie isnt worth 3 million and they want to pay it... No brainer really.

[qprjames]

because for 3 million we can get better. Next.

I beg to differ. He's had a great start and we dont want to sell our best performers.

[BennyBoyRs]

Why would we want to sell our best players? I think you will find we are owned by some very rich people and therefore do not need to sell.

If he goes It will be stupid, we should be keeping our best players not selling them.

And do you think they've become rich by throwing money at everything? Just because someone is rich, it doesn't mean they are going to be happy to bleed money.

Reality check.

[Kirill]

With two months to go, will he still be 3 million if he does not start scoring again.

[qprjames]

And do youthink they've become rich by throwing money at everything? Just because someone is rich, it doesn't mean they are going to be happy to bleed money.

Reality check.

Nope of course they aren't going to chuck money at us but they want us to go up and logic suggests you don't sell your best players. Pretty simple imo

[Jeffro]

So for 3 million we could get Chris commons (OOC)+ Le fondre + Charlie Austin

[WeAreQPR12]

james we are a selling club. Yes we have rich owners but they all were at the club when we sold WR and made a very handy profit. Your forgetting that QPR is a business and you need to sell when offered silly money.

[qprjames]

james we are a selling club. Yes we have rich owners but they all were at the club when we sold WR and made a very handy profit. Your forgetting that QPR is a business and you need to sell when offered silly money.

3 million is Penuts for our owners.

[BennyBoyRs]

Nope of course they aren't going to chuck money at us but they want us to go up and logic suggests you don't sell your best players. Pretty simple imo

With all due respect (because I value your opinion), that's a very naive way of looking at it. Mackie has had a great start, but is nowhere near a £3m player. We could replace him three times over with that sort of dough.

That's pretty simple. IMO, of course.