Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Kakay

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LoftusRoadLad
    W12 Seat
    • Jan 2011
    • 19599

    #1

    Kakay

    Thought his little role was welcoming. Rather him then Kane.
  • gator
    Gold Seat
    • Aug 2010
    • 6791

    #2
    Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad
    Thought his little role was welcoming. Rather him then Kane.
    HämäläinenHe brought some much needed energy in as we were trying to see the match out, I am not sold on any of our fullbacks tbh, maybe Kakay and Himalain will be better in the 3-5-2 as wingbacks!
    @gatorTFC

    Comment

    • MINCER
      Bronze Seat
      • May 2014
      • 677

      #3
      Kakay is a big upgrade compared to the very erratic crossing and positioning of Todd Kane

      Comment

      • Stainrod
        Silver Seat
        • Jan 2018
        • 3162

        #4
        Originally posted by MINCER
        Kakay is a big upgrade compared to the very erratic crossing and positioning of Todd Kane
        I’m not convinced by Kakay yet , Kanes distribution is poor but I think his positional sense on the pitch is better , I find Kakay a bit erratic and 100 miles an hour .

        Comment

        • MINCER
          Bronze Seat
          • May 2014
          • 677

          #5
          Both players are guilty of pushing too far forward leaving opponents acres of space behind.Some of that could be down to the Manager.

          Todd Kane has been round the block and at 27 looks quite poor despite his experience and unlikely to improve.

          Kakay is a converted Winger and has shown very good potential until recently and could go on to be a very good player and capable of bringing in a good transfer fee.

          Comment

          • gator
            Gold Seat
            • Aug 2010
            • 6791

            #6
            Originally posted by MINCER
            Both players are guilty of pushing too far forward leaving opponents acres of space behind.Some of that could be down to the Manager.

            Todd Kane has been round the block and at 27 looks quite poor despite his experience and unlikely to improve.

            Kakay is a converted Winger and has shown very good potential until recently and could go on to be a very good player and capable of bringing in a good transfer fee.
            I didn't know that, you would think he would slot into the EWB role seamlessly then, to me he has looked like a headless chicken quite often!

            @gatorTFC

            Comment

            • MINCER
              Bronze Seat
              • May 2014
              • 677

              #7
              I don’t know about him being a headless Chicken

              He has not played many games at Championship level but looks comfortable in tight areas when getting forward imo.

              Comment

              • gator
                Gold Seat
                • Aug 2010
                • 6791

                #8
                Originally posted by MINCER
                I don’t know about him being a headless Chicken

                He has not played many games at Championship level but looks comfortable in tight areas when getting forward imo.
                Maybe that was a harsh way of saying so far I question his positional sense!
                @gatorTFC

                Comment

                • MYU
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 43466

                  #9
                  I know I'm changing the subject a little but how much could we get for Kane?

                  Comment

                  • FurtiveFox
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4174

                    #10
                    Looks good going forwards but ropey at the back. Not convinced there is a full back in there.

                    We have a looked a lot more solid since change in formation. Playing 4 at the back with the full backs we have doesn't work.

                    Comment

                    • LoftusRoadLad
                      W12 Seat
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 19599

                      #11
                      Originally posted by FurtiveFox
                      Looks good going forwards but ropey at the back. Not convinced there is a full back in there.

                      We have a looked a lot more solid since change in formation. Playing 4 at the back with the full backs we have doesn't work.
                      But as a wing back ?

                      Comment

                      • WeAreQPR12
                        C Club
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 23552

                        #12
                        Originally posted by MYU
                        I know I'm changing the subject a little but how much could we get for Kane?
                        I would say about a packet of cheese and onion crisps and 2 rolo's. Wouldn't even look good playing for Woking. How mark Warburton can't see total sh it is beyond me. New right back and central midfielder alongside a manager is required in the summer
                        I played sunday league football today.

                        Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

                        I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

                        We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

                        Comment

                        • qpr4life
                          Gold Seat
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 5044

                          #13
                          Reality from me, though perhaps im being unfair...

                          KayKay is 'OK' but is he any better than Kane? No for me...
                          Niko is best of a bad bunch, not bad going forward but a #### poor defender. Must replace Manning or perhaps put Barbet at LB for now, though could be tricky with playing wing backs.

                          We as a club love singling out players lately, we did the same with Bidwell whos flying and well liked and the same with Cousins. Sometimes, individual players fit better than others.

                          Kane on the whole isn't that bad!!!

                          Comment

                          • Stainrod
                            Silver Seat
                            • Jan 2018
                            • 3162

                            #14
                            Originally posted by qpr4life
                            Reality from me, though perhaps im being unfair...

                            KayKay is 'OK' but is he any better than Kane? No for me...
                            Niko is best of a bad bunch, not bad going forward but a #### poor defender. Must replace Manning or perhaps put Barbet at LB for now, though could be tricky with playing wing backs.

                            We as a club love singling out players lately, we did the same with Bidwell whos flying and well liked and the same with Cousins. Sometimes, individual players fit better than others.

                            Kane on the whole isn't that bad!!!
                            For all the stick Kane gets and I’ve dished it out myself , it’s mainly distribution that’s his downfall.Our defence has been much improved lately and he’s played his part in it . The problem is if we are going to play wingbacks they have to offer something going forward. Manning would be an ideal wingback, not the greatest defender but had a quality delivery going forward.

                            Comment

                            • qpr4life
                              Gold Seat
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 5044

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Stainrod

                              For all the stick Kane gets and I’ve dished it out myself , it’s mainly distribution that’s his downfall.Our defence has been much improved lately and he’s played his part in it . The problem is if we are going to play wingbacks they have to offer something going forward. Manning would be an ideal wingback, not the greatest defender but had a quality delivery going forward.
                              Its a funny game. Was we losing more because we wasnt using it better in the final 3rd? (Not scoring didnt help)

                              Is Seny the difference alone?

                              Is 5 at the back what we require right now?

                              Manning as WB would have been perfect, right now. Huge loss IMO

                              Comment

                              Working...