Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lumley

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jeffqpr
    replied
    Originally posted by SheepRanger View Post
    There were rumours that Brum were after a back up keeper and Lumley was linked. Might be time for a clean break and might be out pending a transfer? I havent heard that we're looking to extend his deal which is expiring next summer.

    Personally I think Lumley is a great keeper but a £1m bid from Brum might reluctantly be accepted.
    I think they was but have brought in a couple of keepers

    Leave a comment:


  • SheepRanger
    replied
    There were rumours that Brum were after a back up keeper and Lumley was linked. Might be time for a clean break and might be out pending a transfer? I havent heard that we're looking to extend his deal which is expiring next summer.

    Personally I think Lumley is a great keeper but a £1m bid from Brum might reluctantly be accepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeffqpr
    replied
    Originally posted by QPRDave View Post

    And you believe that talking about a word deserves intense scrutiny davie?
    Especially a word that is a well known colloquialism of body part?
    As for in case you are referring to my previous two posts to this ridiculous subject, you are implying I might have "mummy issues growing up".
    I never had the chance, as my mother died in hospital when I was 8 yrs old.
    I don’t think he was applying about anything you said Dave, the subject was about Lumley & it turned into something else about cocks, I agree with him

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Originally posted by davieqpr View Post
    What is it that wants to make some people want to ruin every post with some stupid, inane, attention seeking comments. Did they have Mummy issues growing up? Reply what you want because I have had enough and will become just another lapsed member of this forum.
    And you believe that talking about a word deserves intense scrutiny davie?
    Especially a word that is a well known colloquialism of body part?
    As for in case you are referring to my previous two posts to this ridiculous subject, you are implying I might have "mummy issues growing up".
    I never had the chance, as my mother died in hospital when I was 8 yrs old.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeffqpr
    replied
    Originally posted by davieqpr View Post
    What is it that wants to make some people want to ruin every post with some stupid, inane, attention seeking comments. Did they have Mummy issues growing up? Reply what you want because I have had enough and will become just another lapsed member of this forum.
    Exactly

    Leave a comment:


  • davieqpr
    replied
    What is it that wants to make some people want to ruin every post with some stupid, inane, attention seeking comments. Did they have Mummy issues growing up? Reply what you want because I have had enough and will become just another lapsed member of this forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Originally posted by Stainrod View Post

    Do you like experimenting with cocks Abs .

    Leave a comment:


  • Abseits
    replied
    Howcum you can fill your boots with loads of cocks but you can't have a cheeky single #### then????

    Leave a comment:


  • Stainrod
    replied
    Originally posted by Abseits View Post
    Cockfosters. Cockney. #### of the North. Sorry...... Just experimenting with the word #### which this forum seems to have a problem with.
    Do you like experimenting with cocks Abs .

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Have you tried boy chicken?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abseits
    replied
    Cockfosters. Cockney. #### of the North. Sorry...... Just experimenting with the word #### which this forum seems to have a problem with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abseits
    replied
    They put out a smokescreen last season when they dropped Lumley for Kelly - some #### and bull story about him picking up knock in training. There really is no need..... say nothing and if pressed, simply say we have 3 top notch goalkeepers in competition for one shirt and we're having a look at Dieng today.

    Leave a comment:


  • SheepRanger
    replied
    Originally posted by Stainrod View Post
    They said on commentary today Lumley didn’t play because of a contract issue . That’s the first I’ve heard of that , think maybe it’s a smokescreen to get him out of the club .
    MW also said Dieng commanded his box and gave confidence to the back four. Take from that want you want....

    Leave a comment:


  • ArthurQPR_NYC
    replied
    Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
    Agree.... The issue being he has a contract, and they don't want him to
    LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Agree.... The issue being he has a contract, and they don't want him to

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X