Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Double standards
Collapse
X
-
I think if it is a very long lease (like at the training ground) it will be ok.Originally posted by dogsrrs View PostNot if they win the play off !
but wouldn't like to rely on on the honesty of of the owner of the ground , also have to say I am less than comfortable with the proposed idea of us leasing the Linford Christy
Comment
-
It is another one of the only at Rangers situations. In recent years, Watford, Bournemouth, Leicester and probably many others broke the FFP rules to get promoted but as they have not since been relegated, then it appears they will get away with it. Now it seems Derby sold their stadium to their owner to finance having a go at getting promotion and attracting Lampard to the club but again if they get promoted they will have got away with it. What is the difference to Derby selling their Stadium to our Owners writing off our debt, which in many ways is better for the club than selling your home. Absolutely stinks.
Comment
-
It's said to be a 50 year lease Jack it ain't that long ! W/ F is 200 years , I don't trust our owner enough to sign the lease and ride off into the sunset leaving the club in shlt street ,a pessimist maybeOriginally posted by CroydonCaptainJack View Post
I think if it is a very long lease (like at the training ground) it will be ok.Last edited by dogsrrs; 22-05-2019, 04:21 PM.
Comment
-
Out right cheating, they won't be punishedOriginally posted by Rangerod View Posthttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...ride-park/amp/
Seems very similar to borrowing money from your owners and being in their debt alla Rangers. We got fined a shitload for it. Will the same or similar sanctions be applied to Derby?
Comment
-
Agree, there is very little difference except writing off the debt is far better than selling LR.Originally posted by Kit View PostIt is another one of the only at Rangers situations. In recent years, Watford, Bournemouth, Leicester and probably many others broke the FFP rules to get promoted but as they have not since been relegated, then it appears they will get away with it. Now it seems Derby sold their stadium to their owner to finance having a go at getting promotion and attracting Lampard to the club but again if they get promoted they will have got away with it. What is the difference to Derby selling their Stadium to our Owners writing off our debt, which in many ways is better for the club than selling your home. Absolutely stinks.
As for those other clubs, QPR needn't have got relegated on 2015. if they had perhaps spent some cash in the January window or at least made some effort in appointing a half decent manager to replace Redknapp.
Comment
-
True, they do and could easily provide some much needed funds with slightly inflated sponsorship deals (shirt - front and back, also naming rights for the stadium rather than giving it away - even if it is in a good worthy cause..Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad View PostIf they can do it why dont we and have a pot of gold for the summer ? Our bosses have plenty sister companies.
Comment
Comment