Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
£10 million
Collapse
X
-
we will swap him for a couple pf players who are as useful as a skip,like when we got rid of sinclairChelmsford City the home of RadioComment
-
Comment
-
We should do what Fulham did with Sessognon and refuse all advances from other clubs. Eze will help the club back into the Premier, giving time. Then, he will be worth much much more than 10 million!Comment
-
I tend to agree.
also, if he carries on improving his value will double this time next season.
Plus, there is no need to rush and sell him.Comment
-
This is just bull£h1t from a media source trying to get clicks. Clicks to them equals money from advertising and such. There is no way the club would ever come out and publicly state a price for one of their players. It's up to other clubs to ask us about his availability and make an offer. Ignore all the shite about this.Comment
-
Comment
-
We're doing things correct regarding Eze. I like the silence from the club. The longer this goes in the Transfer window the more desperate clubs will become and we can ask for more money.
Personally I think £12m ish is fair and a good price and could help us secure some good players, like Wells and Wzsolek as we are skint.Comment
-
-
Everyone can be interested but the man himself should realise game time is what he needs. not sitting on a bench in the prem or maybe just playing under 23s millwall must be pissed we have him thoughComment
-
Big call that especially when you consider Freeman was playing for Stevenage when he was 20
And as for improving, this time last year Holloway rated Washington as a better player than Eze by picking him instead
What is it about Eze that makes you think it's fair to compare him with Hoilett and Bolasie..? As in what are the similarities you base that on? And what is different about Freeman?
All I can think of is skin colour which of course isn’t what you base it on. So interested what you are basing it on?Comment
-
I like Eze so wouldn't want to mock him. I just don't like the assumption that all young players only get better when they get older.
Big call that especially when you consider Freeman was playing for Stevenage when he was 20
And as for improving, this time last year Holloway rated Washington as a better player than Eze by picking him instead
What is it about Eze that makes you think it's fair to compare him with Hoilett and Bolasie..? As in what are the similarities you base that on? And what is different about Freeman?
All I can think of is skin colour which of course isn’t what you base it on. So interested what you are basing it on?
When you compare those three, they all like to dribble, but aren't the fastest players. Eze clearly isn't. He is also exceptionally weak - at least at the moment - and may face difficulties. As for Freeman, his work rate, tackling, strength, shooting is from another planet. But don't want to argue more about this as Eze is an important player for us at this level.Comment
Comment