Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

*POSITIVE* Leigertwood Banned!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fez
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 2645

    #31
    Ok at right back, IMO poor in centre midfield does no one thing particularly well!

    Comment

    • stan_bowles
      CCG
      • Mar 2009
      • 8391

      #32
      Originally posted by malcolme
      leigertwood is one of the worst players ever to wear a qpr shirt.
      There have been far,far worse players to have worn the hoops mate.

      Comment

      • swanleyhoop
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 5321

        #33
        Casual, half-hearted and poor distribution -- and has been like that since he joined.
        Our best games weren't with him in CM.
        We can't do any worse in the next three games than the last two (losing away to the bottom team and at home to SCUNNY???)
        He is a weak link in attitude and play -- often loses possession and makes his partner do the work of two men -- perhaps that's why Watson lost heart so quickly.

        And as for giving 100%?
        Gobsmacked, just totally gobsmacked with that one.
        Faurlin is my hero!!! Love him!!! #########

        Comment

        • old school qpr
          Bronze Seat
          • Sep 2009
          • 361

          #34
          Originally posted by stan_bowles
          There have been far,far worse players to have worn the hoops mate.
          they were not on 10 grand a week mate:very_sad:

          Comment

          • benjamin163
            Apprentice
            • Jan 2010
            • 40

            #35
            The mind boggles if you believe Leigertwood is the prime example of poor distribution in our side.
            Across the back four distribution in our side is atrocious, absolutely atrocious. And the only improvement imo is when leigertwood has played right back.
            Rammage, Hill, Borrowdale, Buzsaky, Vine, I could go on. All players whose distribution has been nothing short of disasterous.
            Glad I wasn't there yesterday and prepared to accept if Legs had a stinker but not to have him as an option will hurt over the next 3 games. I'd have him first choice right back and don't see who you could pick with confidence to replace him in midfield and do a better job.

            Comment

            • ollyhoops
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 6013

              #36
              I think he's ok at right back, but not a centre midfield player by any means.

              Comment

              • Hertford Hoop
                W12 Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 15998

                #37
                Originally posted by Fez
                Ok at right back, IMO poor in centre midfield does no one thing particularly well!
                I agree at RB he's better
                I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

                Comment

                • Bwarren20
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 504

                  #38
                  Originally posted by swanleyhoop
                  Casual, half-hearted and poor distribution -- and has been like that since he joined.
                  Our best games weren't with him in CM.
                  We can't do any worse in the next three games than the last two (losing away to the bottom team and at home to SCUNNY???)
                  He is a weak link in attitude and play -- often loses possession and makes his partner do the work of two men -- perhaps that's why Watson lost heart so quickly.

                  And as for giving 100%?
                  Gobsmacked, just totally gobsmacked with that one.
                  Agree with all of that...
                  "The New Era"

                  Been there, done that, got the Ledesma t-shirt!

                  Comment

                  Working...