Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Why are we a team just full of loanees???
Collapse
X
-
sure if we had stayed 4th more would have been spent.
We are mid-table, I wouldn't risk further debt (that would be a big big gamble!!) and increase the wage bill, now would you?ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/Comment
-
If i wanted promotion and had their money, then yes.
whose fault is it we're not 4th? the same people who can fix it. selling one of our best players, loaning our strikers to our rivals and filling up our team with loans wont fix it.Comment
-
that old chestnut, i'm sure if we were 5th or 6th we'd get the same except the excuse would be well they're good enough to be top 6 so why spend any more etc. etc. You don't need to defend them PeteComment
-
I think the reason behind us being a team of loanees has something to do with us having so many loan signings.
Is that the answer you were after?Queens Park Rangers
NPower Champions 2010/2011
PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)Comment
-
BBC Sport's Simon Austin: "I've just been to interview a sports consultant at Deloitte. They estimate only £21m has been spent in the January transfer window so far, compared to £170m last year and £150m in January 2008. There haven't been any £10m signings this year and only one for £5m, which Spurs paid Portsmouth for Younes Kaboul. There were seven £10m signings last January - three were made by Manchester City (Nigel de Jong, Craig Bellamy and Wayne Bridge), three by Spurs (Wilson Palacios, Jermain Defoe and Robbie Keane) and one by Arsenal (Andrey Arshavin).
__________________________________
Think belts are being tightened across the board..We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are...Comment
-
no accountability...
we have not imo developed our yth enough to be ready to step in and cope...
"QUEEN'S PARK LOAN RANGERS".....
it's like supporting half a team.Comment
-
While our prices are among the highest in the Championship, we are nowhere near average Premierships levels.
Crystal Palace average price is higher than ours, £35 for the main stand as an example and Tottenham want £75 for their West Upper.I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.
Comment
-
That price at Spurs applies only to 621 seats and only then for 5 games in a season. Certainly NOT an average.
Palace's average isn't higher either. Quick look confirms that.
In fact (I do love that word) we are the 7th highest priced ground (by average ticket price) in UK football. More than Man City and their multi trazillionaire owners.Last edited by Guest; 01-02-2010, 05:06 PM.Comment
-
your source?That price at Spurs applies only to 621 seats and only then for 5 games in a season. Certainly NOT an average.
Palace's average isn't higher either. Quick look confirms that.
In fact (I do love that word) we are the 7th highest priced ground (by average ticket price) in UK football.I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.
Comment
-
end of the day we've got 2 new players in.
Lets get behind them FFS.
They are going to need a couple of games, before the usual suspects write them off.
if we had been given a 10 million pound budget, then it would have been spent./ Reality is, it wasn'tALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/Comment
-
But where does 7th highest price in UK football come from?, you can't have that even in your head.I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.
Comment
-
Why on earth wouldn't I have that in my head? It's a pretty stark stat for a mid table Championship club who take in loans of Wolves 4th choice players.
Something that we worked out using an abacus when the ST prices where announced.Comment
-
You just made that up, 7th. Where does the info come from?I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.
Comment
Comment