Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

A question of crowds

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sirpiechucker
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 5079

    #1

    A question of crowds

    Okay straight forward FACTS for you. No nonsense just the truth. No picking one random game out of an entire season to make a point but an actual look at the last 5 seasons in the Championship as a whole to make a direct comparison.

    Just to show you where all the information has come from:


    If you are into stats (like me) then it is a particularly good and up to date website.


    Total Season Attendances
    QPR:
    2004/05: 369,283
    2005/06: 309,133
    2006/07: 297,537
    2007/08: 321,053
    2008/09: 324,078
    5 Season Total: 1,621,084

    Total Season Attendances
    Burnley:
    2004/05: 286,713
    2005/06: 286,616
    2006/07: 274,999
    2007/08: 284,391
    2008/09: 300,886
    5 Season Total: 1,433,605

    Attendance difference between QPR & Burnley since 2004/05: 187,479


    187,479 fewer people went through the turnstiles at Burnley than QPR between 2004 and 2009. At say £20 a ticket that is £3.7m less revenue generated than us over 5 years. I could easily speculate that each of the 187,479 extra punters at QPR could have bought programmes, hot dogs, memorabilia etc etc all adding to the coffers but as I don't have an average spend I won't as I don't have the facts. But you know and I know that we do spend money at the ground and the chances are that the 187,479 will have given the club extra revenue.

    187,479, which is an average of 37,495 fans a season fewer than us, which is 1,630 fans a match fewer through the turnstile than us.

    Proof that a club with fewer fans than us meaning less money generated than us (with no doubt smaller sponsorship deals and poorer owners than us) can win promotion to the Premiership.
  • qblockpete
    C Club
    • Mar 2009
    • 22186

    #2
    Good stats, but it is only one team of the various that have been promoted.

    Burnley are the only team in the last 10 years to get promoted with those kind of crowds.
    ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
    THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

    Comment

    • qblockpete
      C Club
      • Mar 2009
      • 22186

      #3
      sorry apart from Wigan

      Who now have much bigger crowds, would like to know compariosn when they go up??
      ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
      THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

      Comment

      • Bluehoop
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 9258

        #4
        SirPie? How do the figures add up against poorly supported Blackburn?
        #standuptocancer
        #inyourfacecancer

        Comment

        • Goddard
          Silver Seat
          • Dec 2009
          • 4529

          #5
          This is turning into, "Apart from all that... what have the Romans done for us?".
          Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


          Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

          Comment

          • SirLes
            Silver Seat
            • Apr 2009
            • 1287

            #6
            Originally posted by qblockpete
            Good stats, but it is only one team of the various that have been promoted.

            Burnley are the only team in the last 10 years to get promoted with those kind of crowds.
            i still dont get your point on this. our billionaire owners knew what size crowds we averaged. if they thought it wasnt enough, why buy the club at all? didnt they do the maths beforehand? once they bought the club, why increase prices so massively to push more people away? why talk about 4 year plans?

            are you saying they didnt know how small our average gates were and now the owners have got their calculators out they are making us, the fans the scapegoats for this mess because not enough of us are turning up to watch that crap? nothing to do with an average success rate of signings being around 1:10? nothing to do with putting very average players on long contracts? or selling our best players? and all the other things we all agree they've messed up on.

            when are they going to take responsibilty for this mess and stop shifting the cause/blame?

            its now being proven that other clubs have done it on similar gates. the difference? they had owners willing to spend and had stability.

            Comment

            • sirpiechucker
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 5079

              #7
              QPR:
              2004/05: 369,283

              Wigan:
              2004/05: 265,941

              Wigan went up that season but had 104,000 fan fewer than us.
              Last edited by sirpiechucker; 25-01-2010, 01:48 PM.

              Comment

              • 80sCasual
                CCG
                • Dec 2009
                • 9231

                #8
                Yes less money, less fans, less players and less managers but they still managed it.
                Queens Park Rangers
                NPower Champions 2010/2011

                PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)

                Comment

                • maddix
                  Silver Seat
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 1210

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sirpiechucker
                  Okay straight forward FACTS for you. No nonsense just the truth. No picking one random game out of an entire season to make a point but an actual look at the last 5 seasons in the Championship as a whole to make a direct comparison.

                  Just to show you where all the information has come from:


                  If you are into stats (like me) then it is a particularly good and up to date website.


                  Total Season Attendances
                  QPR:
                  2004/05: 369,283
                  2005/06: 309,133
                  2006/07: 297,537
                  2007/08: 321,053
                  2008/09: 324,078
                  5 Season Total: 1,621,084

                  Total Season Attendances
                  Burnley:
                  2004/05: 286,713
                  2005/06: 286,616
                  2006/07: 274,999
                  2007/08: 284,391
                  2008/09: 300,886
                  5 Season Total: 1,433,605

                  Attendance difference between QPR & Burnley since 2004/05: 187,479


                  187,479 fewer people went through the turnstiles at Burnley than QPR between 2004 and 2009. At say £20 a ticket that is £3.7m less revenue generated than us over 5 years. I could easily speculate that each of the 187,479 extra punters at QPR could have bought programmes, hot dogs, memorabilia etc etc all adding to the coffers but as I don't have an average spend I won't as I don't have the facts. But you know and I know that we do spend money at the ground and the chances are that the 187,479 will have given the club extra revenue.

                  187,479, which is an average of 37,495 fans a season fewer than us, which is 1,630 fans a match fewer through the turnstile than us.

                  Proof that a club with fewer fans than us meaning less money generated than us (with no doubt smaller sponsorship deals and poorer owners than us) can win promotion to the Premiership.
                  Any one can use statistics to make a point .... 60% of people know that!!!

                  Comment

                  • Goddard
                    Silver Seat
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 4529

                    #10
                    53% of all statistics are made up.
                    Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


                    Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

                    Comment

                    • sirpiechucker
                      Gold Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 5079

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Goddard
                      53% of all statistics are made up.
                      27% of right handed people have two vowels in their first name

                      Comment

                      • oldhoop
                        Silver Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 3467

                        #12
                        32.5% of all statistics are incorrect by up to 11.3%
                        oldhoop

                        The Bread Mans Blue and White Army

                        Comment

                        • Nodge70

                          #13
                          Originally posted by qblockpete
                          Good stats, but it is only one team of the various that have been promoted.

                          Burnley are the only team in the last 10 years to get promoted with those kind of crowds.
                          Hull?

                          Wigan?

                          Watford?

                          Palace?

                          Bristol City & Preston in play off finals?

                          Remember the crowds only increased exponentially when they went up.

                          Comment

                          • stanistheman
                            Platinum Seat
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 11151

                            #14
                            Originally posted by qblockpete
                            sorry apart from Wigan

                            Who now have much bigger crowds, would like to know compariosn when they go up??

                            Pete, this is why I often say that if QPR think big enough to build a new ground, and the team goes up, they will attract more than 25,000.

                            It has happened at every club that did this. Bolton, Wigan, Charlton (improved The Valley), Reading, Stoke, Hull.

                            Even Burnley are pulling in more fans into their old stadium amd if they were to stay up and increase capacity, build a new ground I think they would start to attract more fans from the outskirts of the town (they already get about 20% of the population watching).

                            QPR can't realistically increase Loftus Road, so a new ground is the only viable option if the club want to attract 20,000+ crowds.

                            Comment

                            • qblockpete
                              C Club
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 22186

                              #15
                              Sir Les, not sure Burnley spent fortunes, they bought well.

                              They had a "team" of players and a very good manager.

                              Yes, we have to addresss the team aspect and cut ties with the big time charlies and mercenaries
                              ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                              THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                              Comment

                              Working...