Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Should Paladini resign after this fiasco

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HammersmithR
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 5537

    #16
    Originally posted by IsleworthRanger
    Part-timer

    Cheeky git:boss:

    See you tomorrow.
    First game: Arsenal vs Queen's Park Rangers at Highbury, Saturday 17th November 1984.

    Comment

    • brightonr
      Banned
      • Mar 2009
      • 10922

      #17
      Originally posted by PeterG
      Bearing in mind he is sproting director and chairman should he not shoulder responsibility for the failure of Dowie, Sousa and the players he has been instumental in bringing in
      Dowie, who most people acknowledge was the choice of GP, was sacked by FB after only 15 games when we were 3 points off a play off spot, despite not playing the best football we have ever seen.

      Sousa, Briatore's choice, was given about 26 games, leaving us with virtually no chance of making the play offs, having produced some of the most boring, negative football I have seen from any team, ever.

      So in my opinion PeterG, NO. And whilst on the subject, do you not think that you and those others that insist on criticising him at every opportunity, could actually give it a rest for a while until such time as there is a valid reason to do so. I'm all for debate and accept that criticism will be aimed at various people at certain times, but it appears to me that GP is the subject of some of the most vitriolic, slanderous and pointless abuse, without any well thought out arguments or valid facts to back it up with.

      So much for fairness and unity.

      Comment

      • PeterG
        Silver Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 1957

        #18
        Well I think the valid reason is that we have just sacked another manager. If you check back you will see no vitriol or slanerous accusations from me.

        in fact in the last discussion on this point that i contributed to (didnt start) I was of the opinion that I didn;t have enough information to answer the question positively or negatively.
        its New Era number 8 i tell thee, bring on the fireworks

        Comment

        • ScottJones
          • Mar 2009
          • 6069

          #19
          Originally posted by PeterG
          Well I think the valid reason is that we have just sacked another manager. If you check back you will see no vitriol or slanerous accusations from me.

          in fact in the last discussion on this point that i contributed to (didnt start) I was of the opinion that I didn;t have enough information to answer the question positively or negatively.
          i think u need to change your sig
          Running the London Marathon for the Down's Syndrome Association....


          Visit my charity page here

          Comment

          • brightonr
            Banned
            • Mar 2009
            • 10922

            #20
            Originally posted by PeterG
            Well I think the valid reason is that we have just sacked another manager. If you check back you will see no vitriol or slanerous accusations from me.

            in fact in the last discussion on this point that i contributed to (didnt start) I was of the opinion that I didn;t have enough information to answer the question positively or negatively.
            But PeterG,

            He neither appointed him or sacked him did he, so is no more at fault than you or me.

            Comment

            • PeterG
              Silver Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 1957

              #21
              Scott, why do you think that? its gone straight over my head

              BrightonR

              "He neither appointed him or sacked him did he, so is no more at fault than you or me"

              So what does he do then for all his wages as chairman/Sporting director. Does not Flavio make decisions based on GP's advice?
              its New Era number 8 i tell thee, bring on the fireworks

              Comment

              • stan_bowles
                CCG
                • Mar 2009
                • 8391

                #22
                Originally posted by brightonr
                But PeterG,

                He neither appointed him or sacked him did he, so is no more at fault than you or me.
                Agree.

                Paladini may not be the most popular man at Rangers,but i think the whole Sousa appointment and sacking is a Briatorie thing.

                I thought Sousa knew Briatorie before his appointment?.

                Comment

                • PeterG
                  Silver Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 1957

                  #23
                  Ah sorry scott, got it now, yes I suppose so but you wont see anything as postive related to any dennis wiser we might select next!
                  its New Era number 8 i tell thee, bring on the fireworks

                  Comment

                  • ScottJones
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 6069

                    #24
                    Originally posted by PeterG
                    Ah sorry scott, got it now, yes I suppose so but you wont see anything as postive related to any dennis wiser we might select next!
                    ;)

                    Looking at the betting list, well, I dont want any of them. Might wack a tenner on stan bowles getting it lol
                    Running the London Marathon for the Down's Syndrome Association....


                    Visit my charity page here

                    Comment

                    • stan_bowles
                      CCG
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 8391

                      #25
                      Originally posted by ScottJones
                      ;)

                      Looking at the betting list, well, I dont want any of them. Might wack a tenner on stan bowles getting it lol
                      I'll let you know when my appointment is confirmed.

                      Comment

                      • NewCrossHoop
                        Bronze Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 453

                        #26
                        Got to love the way Pete says that this team with any other manager would have been top six as if its fact.

                        Prove it!

                        I went to all those games and saw a squad that wasn't good enough over the course of a season

                        Comment

                        • brightonr
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 10922

                          #27
                          PeterG,

                          Perhaps he was responsible for bringing in players like Vine, Buszacky, Gorkss, Routledge, Agyemang, Connolly, Cerny & Ephraim.

                          Perhaps he had no say as to wether Parejo, Ledesma or Di Carmine came to us.

                          I do not know exactly what he does for what he gets paid, but I would hazard a guess that if the people who were paying him thought he was making more than his fair share of mistakes, then he would not be around today.

                          Just my opinion though.

                          Comment

                          • stan_bowles
                            CCG
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 8391

                            #28
                            Originally posted by NewCrossHoop
                            Got to love the way Pete says that this team with any other manager would have been top six as if its fact.

                            Prove it!

                            I went to all those games and saw a squad that wasn't good enough over the course of a season
                            I would not say it's a squad problem as such.Just needs a few tweeks.

                            Learning to take a decent corner would be nice,and a couple of half-decent strikers would have made a massive difference.

                            We are defensively solid and will have a great midfield when we have our injured players back.

                            Comment

                            • PeterG
                              Silver Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 1957

                              #29
                              A good list there, of course there are all the others to add but I agree there have been some gems.

                              but sporting director should be more than just bringing in a few players shouldnt it, thats the bit that puzzles me, where does his responsibility start and stop.
                              its New Era number 8 i tell thee, bring on the fireworks

                              Comment

                              • qblockpete
                                C Club
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 22186

                                #30
                                to be fair I suspect

                                Flavio makes all the major decisions, he owns the club

                                Board of owners are

                                Flavio, Bernie and Mittal
                                ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                                THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                                Comment

                                Working...