Team against Sheffield Wednesday

[jmelanie]

I don't choose teams but noticed nobody had started a thread.

[LoftusRoadLad]

Same as vs Reading for me but with Baptism starting for Bidwell ?

[Rangers77]

Same starting line up as Reading, but with Robinson in for Bidwell.

[Kevin Mcleod]

Sylla and Yeni are both out injured.

[Rangers10]

he will MAYBE have Lua Lua for mackie, but I hope he keeps it the same. Got a feeling he may swap perch out for baptiste too. If he's learnt his lesson, he'll start the same 11 as reading.

[corbray]

same team as the one that played reading. bidwell had a good game against reading and probably had his best attacking display for us and could have got on tbe score sheet too as he was unmarked for an open goal when conor was 1 on 1 with the keeper

[qpr4life]

Sylla a loss, but started on the bench.. Yeni a loss again but started on the bench and is replaced by 'a match-fit' ready Lua Lua.

Should be ok, good depth there considering.

[davieqpr]

Hope there is not too much tinkering. Will show if IH has learnt his lesson.

[West London is Rss]

-------------------------Smithies-----------------------------

--------Baptiste---------Onuoha-----------Perch-------------

--------------------------Scowen-----------------------------

Furlong-------Luongo-------------Freeman---------Robinson

-------------Wzaolek--------------Washington----------------


Pack the midfield, and be more solid at the back - might be too early for Caulker but I think we should try it.

Not a fan of Perch or Bidwell in a back 3, or at wing back.

[qpr4life]

-------------------------Smithies-----------------------------

--------Baptiste---------Caulker-----------Onuoha---------

--------------------------Scowen-----------------------------

Furlong-------Luongo-------------Freeman---------Robinson

-------------Wzaolek--------------Washington-------------


Pack the midfield, and be more solid at the back - might be too early for Caulker but I think we should try it.

Not a fan of Perch or Bidwell in a back 3, or at wing back.

Far too many changes for me. Plus Caulker isn't travelling.

[West London is Rss]

Far too many changes for me. Plus Caulker isn't travelling.

Perch instead it is then.

There are going to be some games where we have to change the personnel, going away to Hillsborough is one of them in my opinion. As long as the formation doesn't change, I don't have a problem with changing the team and changing the tactics to try and get a win.

[Cjskinz]

For me, same as v Reading but Smith in for Mackie

With Sheff Weds attacking power we're unlikely to get much rest at the back so as much as i hate to say it, an easy out ball is needed

[72bus]

same as last week , get at 'em early , ok they're a bit warm up front but we'll be alright

[1973 ranger]

Always a hard place to go so keep a settled team and give ourselves a chance as this lot will be a really good test for us and will give us an idea of where we stand.

[West Acton]

-------------------------Smithies-----------------------------

--------Baptiste---------Onuoha-----------Perch-------------

--------------------------Scowen-----------------------------

Furlong-------Luongo-------------Freeman---------Robinson

-------------Wzaolek--------------Washington----------------


Pack the midfield, and be more solid at the back - might be too early for Caulker but I think we should try it.

Not a fan of Perch or Bidwell in a back 3, or at wing back.

Way to many changes to a side that performed excellently last time out in the league.

Think for Sheffield Wed although decent last few years are not a top top side and Fancy them to go backwards from where they have been last few years. We should be taking a point today at the very least with aspirations of turning them over