Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

2 QPR midfielders in Who Scored.com best Xi team of the week 10 out of 10 for...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fghoop
    Apprentice
    • Mar 2011
    • 48

    #1

    2 QPR midfielders in Who Scored.com best Xi team of the week 10 out of 10 for...

    Massimo. Well done sir. 10 out of 10.
    Luke 8.61/10
  • bhujio
    Bronze Seat
    • Feb 2010
    • 378

    #2
    Not bad for a League 1 footballer

    Comment

    • James1979
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 4857

      #3
      I'm pleased luongo has had a good last couple of games. We need to have competition in the squad. But he has been rubbish in a few games and rightly criticized. However, people who think that anyone deserves 10/10 know little about football. Stats may point to 10/10 but just because you make every tackle and every pass does not mean you are 10/10. Much more to it than that.

      Comment

      • CroydonCaptainJack
        Gold Seat
        • Jan 2011
        • 6141

        #4
        Originally posted by James1979
        I'm pleased luongo has had a good last couple of games. We need to have competition in the squad. But he has been rubbish in a few games and rightly criticized. However, people who think that anyone deserves 10/10 know little about football. Stats may point to 10/10 but just because you make every tackle and every pass does not mean you are 10/10. Much more to it than that.
        It must be based on whatever criteria they use. Either way he must have been decent.

        Comment

        • Kevin Mcleod
          Referee
          • Aug 2013
          • 17322

          #5
          Originally posted by CroydonCaptainJack
          It must be based on whatever criteria they use. Either way he must have been decent.
          Fake News.

          Comment

          • James1979
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 4857

            #6
            Originally posted by CroydonCaptainJack
            It must be based on whatever criteria they use. Either way he must have been decent.
            I'm not saying it as an anti luongo point. Just saying that 10/10.....utter rubbish. Adel vs Swansea a few years back was close to 10/10.

            Comment

            • Shepherds Mush
              Platinum Seat
              • Nov 2012
              • 10325

              #7
              Alcantara got 10/10 against Arsenal the other week - 2 goals and an assist.

              Not knocking Luongo but in a 0-0 draw he must have been amazing

              Comment

              • nasser95
                Gold Seat
                • Dec 2012
                • 7216

                #8
                As I said on the match thread, he got a 10/10 for these reasons:

                13 successful dribbles (half of the total we made in that match)
                2 aerials won
                4 successful tackles, 4 successful interceptions and 4 clearances
                3 key passes that directly led to shots on goal
                Held the ball for longer than anyone in our team and took more first touches of it than anyone in the team
                Was generally everywhere on the pitch, winning the ball back and creating chances with his runs and passes

                As Shepherds Mush states, given Alcantara got a 10/10 for 2 goals and an assist, Luongo must have been damn incredible to get it without contributing directly to a goal.

                But I can sorta try to break down the way their scoring system works. Firstly, it's on a position to position basis.

                A player in defence gets a higher boost when they make a tackle than a striker would and in similar vein, they get a lower loss with a shot off target. So Thiago was played as a CAM in that match.

                When he scored, he went from a 6.77 to a 7.88. His second goal took him from a 7.84 to an 8.94. Both times, the goal boosted the score by 1.1.

                Winning an aerial duel though only took him up from a 5.99 to a 6.07. He won 3 all game and also successfully completed 2 dribbles as a CAM. When he completed the second dribble, his score went from 9 to a 9.27.

                As I said, Luongo completed 13 dribbles and 4 tackles and much more. Relative to the position, those are gonna give quite balanced boosts but the sheer volume is enough to bring him up to a 10.

                Hope that explains how they score people.
                "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

                Comment

                • guy.dunstan
                  Apprentice
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 149

                  #9
                  Originally posted by nasser95
                  As I said on the match thread, he got a 10/10 for these reasons:

                  13 successful dribbles (half of the total we made in that match)
                  2 aerials won
                  4 successful tackles, 4 successful interceptions and 4 clearances
                  3 key passes that directly led to shots on goal
                  Held the ball for longer than anyone in our team and took more first touches of it than anyone in the team
                  Was generally everywhere on the pitch, winning the ball back and creating chances with his runs and passes

                  As Shepherds Mush states, given Alcantara got a 10/10 for 2 goals and an assist, Luongo must have been damn incredible to get it without contributing directly to a goal.

                  But I can sorta try to break down the way their scoring system works. Firstly, it's on a position to position basis.

                  A player in defence gets a higher boost when they make a tackle than a striker would and in similar vein, they get a lower loss with a shot off target. So Thiago was played as a CAM in that match.

                  When he scored, he went from a 6.77 to a 7.88. His second goal took him from a 7.84 to an 8.94. Both times, the goal boosted the score by 1.1.

                  Winning an aerial duel though only took him up from a 5.99 to a 6.07. He won 3 all game and also successfully completed 2 dribbles as a CAM. When he completed the second dribble, his score went from 9 to a 9.27.

                  As I said, Luongo completed 13 dribbles and 4 tackles and much more. Relative to the position, those are gonna give quite balanced boosts but the sheer volume is enough to bring him up to a 10.

                  Hope that explains how they score people.
                  Not keen on the stats but fair play to Luongo. Starting to make me eat my words from earlier in the season and hope he continues to do so!

                  Comment

                  • SuperHoopNik
                    CCG
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 6660

                    #10
                    Good player, Luongo . Let's hope he can add some goals to his game just to silence a few people.
                    "When you went to the corner and saw our fans celebrating the way they were you just wanted to be part of it" - Shaun Derry after we beat the scum 1-0

                    Comment

                    • Shepherds Mush
                      Platinum Seat
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 10325

                      #11
                      I've slated Luongo after some performances but there is a PROPER player in there that, hopefully, Holloway can get the best out of

                      Comment

                      • Hertford Hoop
                        W12 Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 15998

                        #12
                        Even 77 will agree he has performed better of late
                        I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

                        Comment

                        Working...